Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price24.82¢/kWh2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.727/gal2026-08 · #3 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$143.542024 · #19 of 50 · highest first
Alaska over time
Explore Alaska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alaska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alaska effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alaska change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Alaska · source units
AlaskaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
6 of 6 reviewed Alaska actions match · 6 date markers shown. 54 major events shown separately.
Alaska · 2024: 24.82¢/kWh · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Alaska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Alaska's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by petroleum generation and also includes biomass and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Alaska Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Alaska · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Alaska · 202424.82¢/kWh
Alaska rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Alaska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Alaska's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by petroleum generation and also includes biomass and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2024 · Alaska: 24.82¢/kWh · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Residential electricity price history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2015
19.83¢/kWh
2016
20.3¢/kWh
2017
21.27¢/kWh
2018
21.94¢/kWh
2019
22.92¢/kWh
2020
22.57¢/kWh
2021
22.55¢/kWh
2022
23.1¢/kWh
2023
23.9¢/kWh
2024
24.82¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 24.82¢/kWh2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska · your comparison
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price
$4.97/galWeek of September 7, 2026
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's West Coast excluding California region, including taxes. The region contains Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$4.823/gal
Weekly change
+15.2¢
One year earlier
$3.946/gal
Change from one year earlier
+102.9¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s West Coast excluding California series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Alaska. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Alaska statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This West Coast excluding California regional estimate should not be read as Alaska’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Alaska community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Alaska · 2024$143.54
Alaska rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2024 · Alaska: $143.54 · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2010
$104.29
2011
$114.42
2012
$116.89
2013
$114.56
2014
$115.79
2015
$119.64
2016
$119.84
2017
$127.83
2018
$125.57
2019
$127.29
2020
$124.66
2021
$133.89
2022
$134.11
2023
$137.88
2024
$143.54
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · $143.542024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska · your comparison
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Alaska · 20246.7 TWh
Alaska rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Alaska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Alaska's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by petroleum generation and also includes biomass and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2024 · Alaska: 6.7 TWh · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Total electricity generation history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2015
6.3 TWh
2016
6.3 TWh
2017
6.5 TWh
2018
6.2 TWh
2019
6.1 TWh
2020
6.3 TWh
2021
6.6 TWh
2022
6.7 TWh
2023
6.7 TWh
2024
6.7 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 6.7 TWh2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska · your comparison
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Alaska · 2024323.2 min/year
Alaska rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2024 · Alaska: 323.2 min/year · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2023
499.4 min/year
2024
323.2 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 323.2 min/year2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska · your comparison
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Alaska · 202449.1 trillion Btu
Alaska rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 49.1 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska · your comparison
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Alaska · 202444.01 Mt CO₂
Alaska rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 44.01 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska · your comparison
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
6 of 6 reviewed Alaska actions · newest first
Jun 18, 2026 · SB 164 · An Act eliminating deductions for the remittance of the motor fuel tax, tobacco taxes, and tire fees; relating to discounts on cigarette stamps; and providing for an effective date. · Enacted · Without governor signatureAlaska Legislature · SB 164
An Act eliminating deductions for the remittance of the motor fuel tax, tobacco taxes, and tire fees; relating to discounts on cigarette stamps; and providing for an effective date.
Jun 18, 2026 · Enacted · Without governor signature
Sen. Kelly Merrick · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Saddler · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Sara Hannan · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Andy Josephson · Cross-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 164 became Chapter 14, SLA 2026 without the governor’s signature on June 18, 2026, effective July 1. Its fuel provision removes the allowance to retain 1% of monthly motor-fuel tax and refined-fuel surcharge, capped at $100, for timely accounting and filing. Bracketed text in the excerpt is the deleted allowance. This changes remittance costs, not the per-gallon tax rate; tobacco and tire provisions are outside this gasoline connection.
Became law without the governor’s signature June 18, 2026: Chapter 14, SLA 2026. Effective July 1, 2026. The journal entry is June 19; it records a June 18 event.
Why this record is included
The gasoline fact is a West Coast excluding California proxy covering Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington. The law changes the amount Alaska fuel dealers or users retain when remitting tax and surcharge; it does not raise the per-gallon tax rate or establish that the lost allowance was passed through into pump prices or changed the four-state average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 43.40.013 is amended to read: Sec. 43.40.013. Collection of the refined fuel surcharge and the motor fuel tax. Every dealer who sells or otherwise transfers refined or motor fuel in the state shall collect the surcharge and tax required in this chapter at the time of sale, and remit the total surcharge and tax collected during each calendar month of each year to the department by the last day of each succeeding month. Every user shall likewise remit the surcharge and tax required in this chapter and accrued on fuel actually used by the user during each month. [IF THE MONTHLY RETURN IS TIMELY FILED, ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL MONTHLY SURCHARGE AND TAX DUE, LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF $100, MAY BE DEDUCTED AND RETAINED TO COVER THE EXPENSE OF ACCOUNTING AND FILING THE MONTHLY RETURN.] At the time the remittance is made, each dealer or user shall submit a statement to the department showing all fuel that the dealer or user has distributed or used during the month.
[…]
* Sec. 6. This Act takes effect July 1, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 22, 2025 · SB 32 · An Act relating to costs incurred by certain electric utilities for renewable energy and battery energy storage. · Pending · Senate ResourcesAlaska Legislature · SB 32
An Act relating to costs incurred by certain electric utilities for renewable energy and battery energy storage.
Jan 22, 2025 · Pending · Senate Resources
Sen. Cathy Giessel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 32 proposes requiring specified costs to be allowed in the rates of electric cooperatives organized under AS 10.25 that participate in a certificated electric reliability organization. The costs must be approved by the utility’s board and concern a new or purchased renewable-energy facility or battery storage system with nameplate capacity below 15,000 kilowatts, or power purchased from such facilities or systems. The bill remains in Senate Resources and does not establish a rate change.
Official bill page lists Senate Resources with status date 2025-01-22. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact measures the average retail electricity price. Recovery of qualifying utility costs in customer rates is a price-setting component; this proposed rule neither sets a statewide price nor demonstrates cheaper electricity. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(i) Costs incurred by an electric cooperative utility organized under AS 10.25 that participates in an electric reliability organization certificated by the commission under AS 42.05.760 must be allowed in the rates charged by the utility if the costs are approved by the utility's board of directors in connection with a new or purchased renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts or power purchased from a renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts. In this subsection, "renewable energy facility" means a facility that generates electricity from geothermal, wind, solar, hydroelectric, hydrokinetic, tidal, or biomass energy or another renewable energy resource.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 2, 2024 · Administrative Order No. 355 · Administrative Order No. 355: Renewable-energy permitting review · Directive issuedGovernor · Administrative Order No. 355
Administrative Order No. 355: Renewable-energy permitting review
May 2, 2024 · Directive issued
Mike Dunleavy · Issued
Reviewed topic context
Administrative Order 355 directed a review of large-scale renewable-energy leasing and permitting, recommendations and a strategic plan. The order calls for a review using existing resources. It does not approve an energy project or adopt new permitting rules.
Issued on 2024-05-02. Official order text dated May 2, 2024; the report deadline is a separate date. The order calls for a review using existing resources. It does not approve an energy project or adopt new permitting rules.
Why this record is included
Administrative Order 355 directed a review of large-scale renewable-energy leasing and permitting, recommendations and a strategic plan. The order calls for a review using existing resources. It does not approve an energy project or adopt new permitting rules. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Alaska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
I, Mike Dunleavy, Governor of the State of Alaska, under the authority of Article III, Sections 1, 23, and 24 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska, find and direct the following: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Alaska has a skilled workforce focused on the development, maintenance, and operation of large-scale energy projects. The State also has tremendous opportunity to develop abundant renewable energy resources including wind, solar, hydroelectric, and geothermal. Increasing investment in Alaska-based energy projects is necessary to lower the cost of energy in Alaska, which is central to our State’s long-term growth and development. Paramount to unlocking Alaska’s vast potential for renewable energy is the review and modernization of Alaska’s current statutory and regulatory framework for energy resource development. Recommending updates to governing law to meet the needs of modern-day Alaska can provide a path to lowering energy costs for Alaskans and increasing Alaska’s global competitiveness in areas such as manufacturing and export. Modernizing Alaska’s legal framework also allows the energy industry to continue to set the standard for the development of safe, reliable, and affordable energy resources for the benefit of the entire State. This aligns with our goals to diversify our energy portfolio and create sustainable, long-term economic opportunities for Alaskans. A comprehensive review of those statutes and regulations applicable to large-scale renewable energy projects, including leasing and permitting, is essential to establishing a more conducive environment for renewable energy projects that have the potential to lower our energy costs and bolster our export potential. ORDER I, Mike Dunleavy, Governor of the State of Alaska, order the following: The State’s energy policy will be focused on developing and maintaining a robust and diverse energy supply portfolio that emphasizes affordability and reliability for consumers. This energy portfolio shall also advance renewable energy parallel to our other well established natural resource development sectors. To achieve parity between renewable and established resource development sectors: 1. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources shall conduct a thorough review of current state leasing and permitting statutes and regulations applicable to large-scale renewable energy project development. 2. This review must consider the efficiency, effectiveness, and competitiveness of the regulations in comparison to those for other natural resource development and identify specific areas where processes can be aligned with or adapted from the frameworks used for other successful resource development projects, ensuring they facilitate rather than hinder large-scale renewable energy development. 3. The review shall develop recommendations aimed at streamlining procedures, reducing bureaucratic hurdles, and fostering a supportive environment for large-scale renewable energy projects. 4. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources shall submit a report to the Governor’s office by October 1, 2024 , detailing the findings and proposed recommendations. This report should also include a strategic plan for implementing the recommended changes. GENERAL PROVISIONS Consistent with law and available appropriations, each affected State agency shall utilize existing personnel and resources to comply with this Order. The Department of Natural Resources shall conduct at least one public meeting with stakeholders, including energy developers. Notice of all public meetings shall be in accordance with AS 44.62.310 and 44.62.319 (Open Meetings Act). Records of the activity of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources conducted in furtherance of this Order are subject to inspection, copying, and distribution as public records under AS 40.25.110 – 40.25.220. DURATION This Order takes effect immediately and remains in effect until revoked. DATED this 2nd day of May 2024. Final Report with Appendices
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 23, 2019 · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · Governor instrument signedGovernor · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster
Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster
Aug 23, 2019 · Governor instrument signed
Mike Dunleavy · Signed
Reviewed original signed instrument
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R2: Authorizes DMVA to use funds made available for necessary Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and administrative/disaster-management expenses. Eligibility, award and payment remain separate.
Reviewed provision R4: Reports home/property damage, evacuation and sheltering, additional response labor/equipment costs, highway disruption and power/natural-gas/communication infrastructure requiring repair. These are emergency findings, not final totals or measured economic outcomes.
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
Why this record is included
The signed findings identify disrupted power and natural-gas infrastructure needing repair. Public Assistance supports eligible utilities; no electricity-rate change or restored-service result is verified.
Retained Alaska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context · health · reviewed policy-topic context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context · income-taxes · reviewed policy-topic context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy-topic context · real-gdp · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 3, 2019 · Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance · Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance · Governor request signed · federal disposition separateGovernor · Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance
Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance
Jan 3, 2019 · Governor request signed · federal disposition separate
Mike Dunleavy · Signed
Reviewed original signed assistance request
On January 3, 2019, Governor Mike Dunleavy requested a presidential major disaster declaration for the November 30 earthquake. The signed request asks for individual and public assistance in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, statewide hazard mitigation, temporary housing, unemployment assistance, legal services, case management and crisis counseling. It commits Alaska to applicable nonfederal cost shares and conditionally asks for SBA assistance if individual assistance is denied. The attached FEMA form is dated December 28. Approval and delivered aid are separate milestones. Historical record. Current eligibility, later amendments, incorporated authorities, actual expenditures and measured effects require separate evidence.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R4: Requests public assistance for debris, emergency measures and permanent restoration, including damaged schools, roads, buildings and utilities. Reports $48,112,398 in preliminary PA costs; utilities figures conflict internally and do not establish final spending.
On January 3, 2019, Governor Mike Dunleavy requested a presidential major disaster declaration for the November 30 earthquake. The signed request asks for individual and public assistance in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, statewide hazard mitigation, temporary housing, unemployment assistance, legal services, case management and crisis counseling. It commits Alaska to applicable nonfederal cost shares and conditionally asks for SBA assistance if individual assistance is denied. The attached FEMA form is dated December 28. Approval and delivered aid are separate milestones. Historical record. Current eligibility, later amendments, incorporated authorities, actual expenditures and measured effects require separate evidence.
Why this record is included
The request describes power outages and utility damage and requests public assistance including utility restoration. Utility estimates contain a retained internal discrepancy.
Retained Alaska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context · health · reviewed policy-topic context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context · income-taxes · reviewed policy-topic context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy-topic context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy-topic context · education · reviewed policy-topic context · real-gdp · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
On January 3, 2019, Governor Mike Dunleavy requested a presidential major disaster declaration for the November 30 earthquake. The signed request asks for individual and public assistance in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, statewide hazard mitigation, temporary housing, unemployment assistance, legal services, case management and crisis counseling. It commits Alaska to applicable nonfederal cost shares and conditionally asks for SBA assistance if individual assistance is denied. The attached FEMA form is dated December 28. Approval and delivered aid are separate milestones.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Dec 2, 2018 · December 2 earthquake declaration · Walker signs the written earthquake disaster declaration · Historical signed disaster declarationGovernor · December 2 earthquake declaration
Walker signs the written earthquake disaster declaration
Dec 2, 2018 · Historical signed disaster declaration
Bill Walker · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed complete historical signed instrument reproduction
The signed written declaration authorizes earthquake assistance and temporary housing in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, delegates specified emergency powers and suspends identified state-agency permit requirements for urgent DOT work subject to federal-law and funding limits. Historical instrument reproduced in Alaska DOT’s official guide. Visible signature is not forensic authentication. Later amendments, historical incorporated authorities, legislative concurrence, expenditure and measured effects remain separate evidence.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R3: The commissioner may exercise, as necessary, AS26.23.020(g)(1)–(7), (9) and (10). Subsections (8) and (11) are not included in this delegation. Temporary housing is separately authorized in this declaration; the full historical meaning of each incorporated power remains unverified because the downloaded statute endpoint returns2025 text.
Reviewed provision R5: The declaration’s recitals describe road/rail damage, power and water disruption, damaged homes and personal property, shelters and school, business and office closures. These describe the emergency context; they do not measure changes in educational attainment, unemployment or economic output.
The signed written declaration authorizes earthquake assistance and temporary housing in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, delegates specified emergency powers and suspends identified state-agency permit requirements for urgent DOT work subject to federal-law and funding limits. Historical instrument reproduced in Alaska DOT’s official guide. Visible signature is not forensic authentication. Later amendments, historical incorporated authorities, legislative concurrence, expenditure and measured effects remain separate evidence.
Why this record is included
The declaration expressly records widespread power disruption and authorizes emergency response; no electricity-price effect is claimed and historical incorporated powers remain under review.
Retained Alaska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context · health · reviewed policy-topic context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context · income-taxes · reviewed policy-topic context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy-topic context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy-topic context · education · reviewed policy-topic context · real-gdp · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The signed written declaration authorizes earthquake assistance and temporary housing in Anchorage, Mat-Su and Kenai, delegates specified emergency powers and suspends identified state-agency permit requirements for urgent DOT work subject to federal-law and funding limits.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Alaska officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Alaska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
36 statements from 20 candidates
2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Energy & electricity
We will push for spur lines off the natural gas pipeline to deliver cheap, clean, reliable energy and heat to Alaskans. Gas should not just be exported or centralized. It should be used to: • Lower electric rates • Reduce heating costs • Replace expensive diesel • Support industry, housing, and loca…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Build gas-pipeline spur lines for Alaska energy and heating
Candidate campaign source
We will push for spur lines off the natural gas pipeline to deliver cheap, clean, reliable energy and heat to Alaskans. Gas should not just be exported or centralized. It should be used to: • Lower electric rates • Reduce heating costs • Replace expensive diesel • Support industry, housing, and local grids
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will unleash aggressive resource development, expand access to land and housing, lower energy costs, build infrastructure, and create an economy where workers, tradesmen, miners, fishermen, small businesses, and families thrive again.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Expand resource development, housing access and infrastructure
Government-published candidate material
I will unleash aggressive resource development, expand access to land and housing, lower energy costs, build infrastructure, and create an economy where workers, tradesmen, miners, fishermen, small businesses, and families thrive again.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
View 5 more statements from Jonathan S. “JKT” Kreiss-Tomkins
Energy & electricity
Make data centers pay the full cost of their electricity, without any direct or indirect subsidies from existing ratepayers. Prevent financial risk from being shifted to the public.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Make data centers cover electricity costs without ratepayer subsidies
Candidate campaign source
Make data centers pay the full cost of their electricity, without any direct or indirect subsidies from existing ratepayers. Prevent financial risk from being shifted to the public.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Energy & electricity
“The gasline is not simply an energy project,” Walker said. “It is Alaska’s economic future. Thousands of jobs. New long-term revenue. Lower energy costs. New opportunities for communities across Alaska. We cannot continue to let politics and changing administrations stall Alaska’s future.”
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: “We’re not running to manage decline,” Hoffbeck said. “We’re running to grow Alaska again.”
Candidate campaign source
“The gasline is not simply an energy project,” Walker said. “It is Alaska’s economic future. Thousands of jobs. New long-term revenue. Lower energy costs. New opportunities for communities across Alaska. We cannot continue to let politics and changing administrations stall Alaska’s future.”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For decades, I’ve worked on energy issues, including advancing the Alaska gasline project and securing agreements with international buyers that put Alaska’s gasline on the global stage. I will protect Alaskans from rising energy costs while continuing to advance the gasline project.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability
Government-published candidate material
For decades, I’ve worked on energy issues, including advancing the Alaska gasline project and securing agreements with international buyers that put Alaska’s gasline on the global stage. I will protect Alaskans from rising energy costs while continuing to advance the gasline project.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Affordable Energy Affordable energy is the foundation of a stronger Alaska. Lowering energy costs helps families, supports businesses, creates jobs, and strengthens our economy. As Governor, I will prioritize responsible energy development and invest in infrastructure that delivers reliable, afforda…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability
Government-published candidate material
Affordable Energy Affordable energy is the foundation of a stronger Alaska. Lowering energy costs helps families, supports businesses, creates jobs, and strengthens our economy. As Governor, I will prioritize responsible energy development and invest in infrastructure that delivers reliable, affordable power across our state while increasing refined fuel capacity to improve Alaska’s energy security.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Energy & electricity
That means responsibly developing Alaska’s oil and natural gas while also investing in hydroelectric power, geothermal, wind, solar, advanced nuclear technologies, battery storage, and the transmission infrastructure needed to connect communities and strengthen our electric grid. Alaska’s long-term …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordable, Reliable & Responsible Energy
Candidate campaign source
That means responsibly developing Alaska’s oil and natural gas while also investing in hydroelectric power, geothermal, wind, solar, advanced nuclear technologies, battery storage, and the transmission infrastructure needed to connect communities and strengthen our electric grid. Alaska’s long-term energy security cannot rest on a single project or resource; it requires a diverse, resilient system that can adapt to changing conditions. ( Anchorage Daily News )
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Energy & electricity
Alaska has everything it needs to meet that moment: 365 million acres of land, extraordinary renewable energy potential, Indigenous knowledge systems built over millennia, and communities that have always known how to do more with less. What has been missing is a Governor willing to build an economy…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Alaska has everything it needs to meet that moment: 365 million acres of land, extraordinary renewable energy potential, Indigenous knowledge systems built over millennia, and communities that have always known how to do more with less. What has been missing is a Governor willing to build an economy worthy of all of it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Energy & electricity
“Natural gas for the railbelt and for export is essential. But in a state with 3 million lakes and 12,000 rivers, I will also work to harness hydro to a greater degree. If we add hydro power to what will be abundant natural gas power, it will lower our energy costs to such a degree that we’ll be com…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
“Natural gas for the railbelt and for export is essential. But in a state with 3 million lakes and 12,000 rivers, I will also work to harness hydro to a greater degree. If we add hydro power to what will be abundant natural gas power, it will lower our energy costs to such a degree that we’ll be competitive with the lower 48. Adding microreactors to the mix may make sense.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We'll put our fiscal house in order, drive down energy costs, diversify our economy, open Alaska's land and resources to Alaskans, and build infrastructure that good jobs require. My plan and steps are at my website: AlaskansforHughes.com/issues.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability
Government-published candidate material
We'll put our fiscal house in order, drive down energy costs, diversify our economy, open Alaska's land and resources to Alaskans, and build infrastructure that good jobs require. My plan and steps are at my website: AlaskansforHughes.com/issues.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Energy costs in Alaska are among the highest in the country, especially for heating. Families should not be paying some of the highest bills in America while living in an energy-rich state.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reviving The Alaska Dream
Candidate campaign source
Energy costs in Alaska are among the highest in the country, especially for heating. Families should not be paying some of the highest bills in America while living in an energy-rich state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Develop oil and gas and restore renewable-energy tax credits
Candidate campaign source
I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alaska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Alaska incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alaska legislators and Alaska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alaska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Alaska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Sen. Cathy Giessel
Alaska Senate · R–AK
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Cathy GiesselAlaska Legislature · SB 32
An Act relating to costs incurred by certain electric utilities for renewable energy and battery energy storage.
Jan 22, 2025 · Pending · Senate Resources
Sen. Cathy Giessel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 32 proposes requiring specified costs to be allowed in the rates of electric cooperatives organized under AS 10.25 that participate in a certificated electric reliability organization. The costs must be approved by the utility’s board and concern a new or purchased renewable-energy facility or battery storage system with nameplate capacity below 15,000 kilowatts, or power purchased from such facilities or systems. The bill remains in Senate Resources and does not establish a rate change.
Official bill page lists Senate Resources with status date 2025-01-22. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact measures the average retail electricity price. Recovery of qualifying utility costs in customer rates is a price-setting component; this proposed rule neither sets a statewide price nor demonstrates cheaper electricity. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(i) Costs incurred by an electric cooperative utility organized under AS 10.25 that participates in an electric reliability organization certificated by the commission under AS 42.05.760 must be allowed in the rates charged by the utility if the costs are approved by the utility's board of directors in connection with a new or purchased renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts or power purchased from a renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts. In this subsection, "renewable energy facility" means a facility that generates electricity from geothermal, wind, solar, hydroelectric, hydrokinetic, tidal, or biomass energy or another renewable energy resource.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Kelly MerrickAlaska Legislature · SB 164
An Act eliminating deductions for the remittance of the motor fuel tax, tobacco taxes, and tire fees; relating to discounts on cigarette stamps; and providing for an effective date.
Jun 18, 2026 · Enacted · Without governor signature
Sen. Kelly Merrick · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Saddler · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Sara Hannan · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Andy Josephson · Cross-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 164 became Chapter 14, SLA 2026 without the governor’s signature on June 18, 2026, effective July 1. Its fuel provision removes the allowance to retain 1% of monthly motor-fuel tax and refined-fuel surcharge, capped at $100, for timely accounting and filing. Bracketed text in the excerpt is the deleted allowance. This changes remittance costs, not the per-gallon tax rate; tobacco and tire provisions are outside this gasoline connection.
Became law without the governor’s signature June 18, 2026: Chapter 14, SLA 2026. Effective July 1, 2026. The journal entry is June 19; it records a June 18 event.
Why this record is included
The gasoline fact is a West Coast excluding California proxy covering Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington. The law changes the amount Alaska fuel dealers or users retain when remitting tax and surcharge; it does not raise the per-gallon tax rate or establish that the lost allowance was passed through into pump prices or changed the four-state average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 43.40.013 is amended to read: Sec. 43.40.013. Collection of the refined fuel surcharge and the motor fuel tax. Every dealer who sells or otherwise transfers refined or motor fuel in the state shall collect the surcharge and tax required in this chapter at the time of sale, and remit the total surcharge and tax collected during each calendar month of each year to the department by the last day of each succeeding month. Every user shall likewise remit the surcharge and tax required in this chapter and accrued on fuel actually used by the user during each month. [IF THE MONTHLY RETURN IS TIMELY FILED, ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL MONTHLY SURCHARGE AND TAX DUE, LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF $100, MAY BE DEDUCTED AND RETAINED TO COVER THE EXPENSE OF ACCOUNTING AND FILING THE MONTHLY RETURN.] At the time the remittance is made, each dealer or user shall submit a statement to the department showing all fuel that the dealer or user has distributed or used during the month.
[…]
* Sec. 6. This Act takes effect July 1, 2026.
Only current Alaska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alaska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Alaska snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Alaska, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.