Alabama · individual fact

Alabama unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3%2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents2,289,1202024 · #24 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer0.9%2025 · 11-month average · #42 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3%1.5%4.5%7.4%Alabama, 2015: 6.1%Alabama, 2016: 5.8%Alabama, 2017: 4.5%Alabama, 2018: 3.9%Alabama, 2019: 3.2%Alabama, 2020: 6.4%Alabama, 2021: 3.4%Alabama, 2022: 2.5%Alabama, 2023: 2.5%Alabama, 2024: 3%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 16National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonAlabama · Alabama approves paid parental leave for eligible public employees · 2025-04-02Alabama public-employee parental leaveNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Alabama Legislature · 6● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 1◆ Governor · 4■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

11 of 11 reviewed Alabama actions match · 11 date markers shown. 16 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2024: 3% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
20243%#40 of 504%
20232.5%#44 of 50Not available
20222.5%#43 of 50Not available
20213.4%#44 of 50Not available
20206.4%#33 of 50Not available
20193.2%#31 of 50Not available
20183.9%#22 of 50Not available
20174.5%#17 of 50Not available
20165.8%#7 of 50Not available
20156.1%#8 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Alabama · 20243%
Alabama rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Annual unemployment rate history in Alabama1.9%4.5%7%20152024
2024 · Alabama: 3% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
20156.1%
20165.8%
20174.5%
20183.9%
20193.2%
20206.4%
20213.4%
20222.5%
20232.5%
20243%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 3%2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama · your comparison3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Alabama · 2025 · 11-month average0.9%
Alabama rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 0.9%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama · your comparison0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Alabama · 20252%
Alabama rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Annual real GDP growth history in Alabama-3.3%2.1%7.5%20152025
2025 · Alabama: 2% · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
20151.4%
20161.9%
20171.8%
20181.9%
20192%
2020-1.1%
20215.1%
20222.6%
20233.2%
20242.6%
20252%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 2%2025 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama · your comparison2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Alabama · December 202591,000
Alabama rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Openings · number history in Alabama-970,8503,630,5008,231,850July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Alabama: 91,000 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Openings · number history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
July 2025106,000
August 202598,000
September 2025102,000
October 2025100,000
November 202595,000
December 202591,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 91,000December 2025 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama · your comparison91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

26 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Alabama Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 11 statements

Doug Jones

11 statements

Democratic · Governor · AL

Jobs & workforce context

Support second-chance hiring so more Alabamians can re-enter the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Support second-chance hiring so more Alabamians can re-enter the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
View 10 more statements from Doug Jones
Jobs & workforce context

Cut red tape that blocks workers and small businesses Reform occupational licensing rules that can cost Alabama $1.88 billion and 21,000 jobs annually. Support second-chance hiring so more Alabamians can re-enter the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Cut red tape that blocks workers and small businesses Reform occupational licensing rules that can cost Alabama $1.88 billion and 21,000 jobs annually. Support second-chance hiring so more Alabamians can re-enter the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Create Jobs Worth Staying For

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Create Jobs Worth Staying For

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

That equals roughly 160,000 Alabamians sidelined from the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

That equals roughly 160,000 Alabamians sidelined from the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Workforce participation is 57.9% overall and 71% for prime working-age adults, which places Alabama near the bottom nationally.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Workforce participation is 57.9% overall and 71% for prime working-age adults, which places Alabama near the bottom nationally.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Alabama is turning down federal healthcare dollars while families struggle, hospitals close, and working people fall into the coverage gap. Doug’s priority is straightforward: expand Medicaid to lower costs, protect rural care, and strengthen the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Alabama is turning down federal healthcare dollars while families struggle, hospitals close, and working people fall into the coverage gap. Doug’s priority is straightforward: expand Medicaid to lower costs, protect rural care, and strengthen the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

A healthier, more stable workforce

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

A healthier, more stable workforce

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials. Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials. Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗

2026 Alabama Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

John Wahl

1 statement

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · AL

Jobs & workforce context

Alabama’s working families deserve economic opportunities, not government roadblocks. John Wahl supports pro-growth policies that reduce red tape, attract new businesses, and empower entrepreneurs. He believes in creating a climate where small businesses can thrive and workers can earn a good living…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Where John Stands

Candidate campaign source

Alabama’s working families deserve economic opportunities, not government roadblocks. John Wahl supports pro-growth policies that reduce red tape, attract new businesses, and empower entrepreneurs. He believes in creating a climate where small businesses can thrive and workers can earn a good living. John will fight for job training programs, workforce development, and support energy independence to help Alabama compete — and win — in the national economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Wahl — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Rhett Marques

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · AL

Jobs & workforce context

America’s military must remain second to none. Communist China is our most dangerous enemy, and threats from Iran, North Korea, Russia, transnational cartels, and radical Islamic terrorists cannot be ignored. Alabama’s First Congressional District holds the key to peace through strength, from buildi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

America’s military must remain second to none. Communist China is our most dangerous enemy, and threats from Iran, North Korea, Russia, transnational cartels, and radical Islamic terrorists cannot be ignored. Alabama’s First Congressional District holds the key to peace through strength, from building the ships that protect our seas to maintaining America’s air dominance. I will fight tooth and nail with President Trump to make sure our troops have the resources and technology they need to keep America safe and free—and that Alabama’s defense industry continues to support thousands of good-paying jobs across our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Rhett Marques campaign source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Arnold Mooney

Alabama House of Representatives, District 43 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Arnold Mooney
Alabama Legislature · HB 564

Public assistance, regular cross-checks required for Medicaid and food assistance eligibility

Apr 10, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Arnold Mooney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require Medicaid eligibility verification and recurring matches against state and federal records to assess continued eligibility. It addresses insurance enrollment and continuity and did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-04-10). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For the purposes of this section, the term "eligibility" refers to eligibility for participation in or receipt of benefits from Medicaid. (b)(1) The Alabama Medicaid Agency may not accept eligibility determinations from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c). (2) The agency may accept assessments from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c), provided that the agency verifies eligibility and makes eligibility determinations. (c) Except where required by federal law, the Alabama Medicaid Agency may not: (1) Accept self-attestation of income, residency, age, household composition, caretaker or relative status, or receipt of other coverage without verifying that information prior to enrollment; or (2) Request the authority to waive or decline to periodically check any available income-related data sources to verify eligibility. (d) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall enter into data matching agreements to receive and review information that may indicate a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility and cross-check households enrolled in Medicaid with other state data sets as follows: (1) On at least a monthly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Alabama Department of Public Health, including, but not limited to, death records. b. The Department of Human Resources, including, but not limited to, potential changes in residency as identified by out-of-state electronic benefit (EBT) transactions. c. The Department of Corrections, including, but not limited to, incarceration status. (2) On at least a quarterly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Department of Workforce, including, but not limited to, changes in employment, income, wages, assets, or disability status. b. The Department of Revenue, including, but not limited to, potential changes in income, wages, or residency as identified by tax records. (e) At least once a month, the Alabama Medicaid Agency must assess continued eligibility and act on any changes that may affect eligibility based on a review of data from the following federal sources: (1) From the United States Social Security Administration, earned income information, death register information, incarceration records, supplemental security income information, beneficiary records, earnings information, and pension information. (2) From the United States Department of Health and Human Services, income and employment information maintained in the National Directory of New Hires database and child support enforcement data. (3) From the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, payment and earnings information. (4) From the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, national fleeing felon information. (f) On at least a quarterly basis, the Alabama Medicaid Agency shall make available on its public website all of the following data from findings on noncompliance and fraud investigations, provided the data is presented in the aggregate and does not include confidential or personally identifying information: (1) The number of Medicaid cases investigated for intentional program violations or fraud. (2) The total number of Medicaid cases referred to the Attorney General's office for prosecution. (3) Improper payments and expenditures. (4) Monies received. (5) Aggregate data concerning improper payments and ineligible recipients as a percentage of those investigated and reviewed. (g) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall adopt rules to implement and administer this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ben Robbins

Alabama House of Representatives, District 33 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ben Robbins
Alabama Legislature · HB 302

Workforce; regulating staffing and hiring of aliens with temporary or asylum status in the state

Apr 9, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Ben Robbins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposed Alabama Foreign Worker Transparency Act would require disclosures concerning the recruitment and employment of workers in specified temporary or asylum-related immigration categories. It did not become law and does not treat all foreign-born residents as unauthorized immigrants.

Read Second Time in Second House. Latest official history entry: Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar (2025-04-09). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§25-11-33 (a) Beginning October 1, 2025, no entity may perform the services of a labor broker in this state, as defined in this article, unless the entity registers on an annual basis with the department. (b) Each entity subject to the registration requirement shall file with the department a completed registration form that shall include the following information: (1) The names under which the entity conducts business. (2) The address of the principal place of business of the entity and the address of each office or location it maintains in the state. (3) The entity's taxpayer or employer identification number. (4) A list by jurisdiction of each name under which the entity has operated in the preceding five years, including any alternative names and names of predecessor entities. (5) The names of all individuals or entities who own, directly or indirectly, any equity interest in the registering entity, unless the registering entity distributes shares of ownership to the public. (6) Disclosure of any conviction in any jurisdiction for any crime of moral turpitude as defined in Section 34-13-1, or human trafficking, committed by an individual who is an employee or a contractor who performs work for the entity. (7) If the registrant is a foreign entity, the name and location of the individual or entity's registered agent in the state. (c) The information required under subsection (b) shall be submitted to the department under oath with the notarized signature of an officer or principal of the entity. (d) If the information submitted to the department discloses that an employee or a contractor who performs services for the entity has been convicted for a crime as described in subdivision (b)(6), and the employee or contractor is located in the state, the entity shall be ineligible to perform the services of a labor broker in this state while the entity retains the individual as an employee or contractor. (e) The department shall adopt rules establishing the following: (1) The registration fee and any filing fees in amounts that are sufficient for the department to administer this article. (2) Additional information required by the registration form and provisions for supplementing or revising registration information, as is necessary to administer this article. §25-11-34 A labor broker subject to the registration requirement of Section 25-11-33 shall submit to the department, on an annual basis, a report that contains the following information with respect to each foreign worker referred or supplied to a third-party client: (1) The name of the foreign worker and the nation of origin. (2) The location within or outside the United States at which the labor broker first established contact with the foreign worker. (3) The identity of the third-party client in the state to which the foreign worker was referred, delegated, or supplied. §25-11-35 (a) Beginning October 1, 2025, a labor broker subject to the registration requirement of Section 25-11-33 or a charitable organization that is a sponsor shall comply with the requirements of this section. (b)(1) A labor broker or charitable organization shall submit to the department, for each foreign worker and each associated authorized alien it sponsors, copies of: (i) the declaration or affidavit of support submitted to DHS; and (ii) approval by DHS of sponsor status. (2) The information required in subdivision (1) shall be submitted to the department no later than 30 days after receiving approval from DHS of sponsor status. (3) If the place of residence of the foreign worker or associated authorized alien under sponsorship changes from the residence as shown in the declaration or affidavit of support, the labor broker or charitable organization is under a continuous duty for the duration of the sponsorship to notify the department of the change in address. (c) Any labor broker or charitable organization that arranges for, or refers, a foreign worker or any associated authorized alien to any individual or other entity for sponsorship shall submit to the department, on an annual basis, all of the following information: (1) The name of the foreign worker or associated authorized alien for whom the proposed sponsorship was arranged or the referral was made. (2) In the case of an individual to provide sponsorship, the individual's residential address and available contact information. (3) In the case of an entity to provide sponsorship, the address of the location of operation and available contact information.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ed Oliver

Alabama House of Representatives, District 81 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ed Oliver
Alabama Legislature · HB 29

Unemployment compensation, unemployed individual required to contact an increased number of prospective employers for each week of unemployment claimed; further providing for the meaning of failure to seek or accept suitable work

Mar 4, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Ed Oliver · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require unemployment claimants to contact at least five prospective employers each week and document their job search, alongside other changes to suitable-work rules. It concerns eligibility for unemployment cash benefits and did not become law.

Read Second Time in Second House. Latest official history entry: Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar (2025-03-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(5) Made a reasonable and active effort to secure work which he or she is qualified to perform by past experience and training, unless the failure is because the individual is before any court of the United States or any state pursuant to a lawfully issued summons to appear for jury duty. "Reasonable and active effort" means engaging in systematic and sustained efforts to find work, including contacting at least five prospective employers for each week of unemployment claimed. The department shall require the claimant to provide proof of work search efforts when filing his or her weekly certification. A claimant's subsequent proof of work search efforts may not include the same prospective employer, unless the employer has indicated since the time of the initial contact that the employer is hiring. The department shall conduct random reviews of at least five percent of the work search proof provided by claimants each week. The Governor by executive order may suspend the work search requirement during a state of emergency to the extent permissible by federal law. For the purposes of this subdivision, the entitlement to regular or extended benefits of any individual who is determined not to be actively engaged in seeking work during any week because of jury duty, shall be determined pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (3) without regard to the disqualification provisions otherwise applicable under Section 25-4-75(i)(1)b. and Section 25-4-75(i)(2). The term "jury duty" as used in this subdivision means the performance of service as a juror, during all periods of time an individual is engaged in service as a juror, in any court of a state or the United States pursuant to the law of the state or the United States and the rules of the court in which the individual is engaged in the performance of service as a juror.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ontario Tillman

Alabama House of Representatives, District 56 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ontario Tillman
Alabama Legislature · HB 535

Unemployment compensation benefits, employer lockout during labor dispute, benefits authorized

Apr 8, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Ontario Tillman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would create an exception to the labor-dispute disqualification for unemployment compensation when unemployment is directly due to an employer lockout. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-04-08). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"§25-4-78 An individual shall be disqualified for total or partial unemployment for any of the following: (1) LABOR DISPUTE IN PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT OTHER THAN EMPLOYER LOCKOUTS. For any week in which an individual's total or partial unemployment is directly due to a labor dispute still in active progress in the establishment in which he or she is or was last employed, unless the total or partial unemployment is directly due to an employer lockout. For the purposes of this section only, the term labor dispute includes any controversy concerning terms, tenure, or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing, or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment, regardless of whether the disputants stand in the proximate relation of employer and employee. This definition shall not relate to a dispute between an individual worker and his or her employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Arthur Orr

Alabama Senate, District 3 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Arthur Orr
Alabama Legislature · SB 61

Public assistance; regular cross-checks required for Medicaid and food assistance eligibly, categorical eligibly for food assistance prohibited, eligibility for food assistance further provided for

Apr 7, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed

Sen. Arthur Orr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require Medicaid eligibility verification and recurring data matches, including checks of enrollment information and changes in household circumstances. It addresses eligibility and coverage continuity and was indefinitely postponed.

Indefinitely Postponed in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Currently Indefinitely Postponed (2026-04-07). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For the purposes of this section, the term "eligibility" refers to eligibility for participation in or receipt of benefits from Medicaid. (b)(1) The Alabama Medicaid Agency may not accept eligibility determinations from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c). (2) The agency may accept assessments from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c), provided that the agency verifies eligibility and makes eligibility determinations. (c) Except where required by federal law, the Alabama Medicaid Agency may not: (1) Accept self-attestation of income, residency, age, household composition, caretaker or relative status, or receipt of other coverage without verifying that information prior to enrollment; or (2) Request the authority to waive or decline to periodically check any available income-related data sources to verify eligibility. (d) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall enter into data matching agreements to receive and review information that may indicate a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility and cross-check households enrolled in Medicaid with other state data sets, including all of the following: (1) On at least a monthly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Alabama Department of Public Health, including, but not limited to, death records. b. The State Department of Human Resources, including, but not limited to, potential changes in residency as identified by out-of-state electronic benefit (EBT) transactions. c. The Department of Corrections, including, but not limited to, incarceration status. (2) On at least a quarterly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Department of Workforce, including, but not limited to, changes in employment, income, wages, assets, or disability status. b. The Department of Revenue, including, but not limited to, potential changes in income, wages, or residency as identified by tax records. (e) At least once a month, the Alabama Medicaid Agency shall assess continued eligibility and act on any changes that may affect eligibility based on a review of data from the following federal sources: (1) From the United States Social Security Administration, earned income information, death register information, incarceration records, supplemental security income information, beneficiary records, earnings information, and pension information. (2) From the United States Department of Health and Human Services, income and employment information maintained in the National Directory of New Hires database and child support enforcement data. (3) From the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, payment and earnings information. (4) From the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, national fleeing felon information. (5) From the United States Postal Service, change of address information. (f) Beginning not later than October 1, 2029, the Alabama Medicaid Agency shall submit enrollment information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' national Medicaid enrollment database on a monthly basis for the purpose of identifying individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid in more than one state. (g) On at least a quarterly basis, the Alabama Medicaid Agency shall make available on its public website all of the following data from findings on noncompliance and fraud investigations, provided the data is presented in the aggregate and does not include confidential or personally identifying information: (1) The number of Medicaid cases investigated for intentional program violations or fraud. (2) The total number of Medicaid cases referred to the Attorney General's office for prosecution. (3) Improper payments and expenditures. (4) Monies received. (5) Aggregate data concerning improper payments and ineligible recipients as a percentage of those investigated and reviewed. (h) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall adopt rules to implement and administer this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt

U.S. Senate, Alabama · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Katie Boyd Britt
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · S 4620

Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2026

May 21, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Mandatory E-Verify Act proposal would phase in employment-eligibility verification requirements for hiring and certain recruiting or referrals. It concerns work authorization and does not establish a change in the number of foreign-born residents.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Mandatory E-Verify for all employers(a)In generalAny person or other entity hiring, recruiting, or referring an individual for employment in the United States shall utilize E-Verify in accordance with this section. (b) Implementation timeline (1) Hiring Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), an employer shall use E-Verify whenever hiring an individual for employment in the United States beginning— (A) on the date that is 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act if the employer has 10,000 or more employees in the United States on such date of enactment; (B) on the date that is 9 months after the date of the enactment of this Act if the employer has at least 500 employees in the United States and fewer than 10,000 employees in the United States on such date of enactment; (C) on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act if the employer has at least 20 employees in the United States and fewer than 500 employees in the United States on such date of enactment; (D) on the date that is 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act if the employer has at least 1 employee in the United States and fewer than 20 employees in the United States on such date of enactment; and (E) on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act for any new employer. (2) Recruiting and referring Except as provided in paragraph (3), the requirement under subsection (a) shall apply to a person or other entity recruiting or referring an individual for employment in the United States beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Agricultural labor or services Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the requirement under subsection (a) shall not apply to the verification of employment eligibility for employees performing agricultural labor or services until on or after the date that is 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. (4) Critical infrastructure The Secretary of Homeland Security shall authorize and direct any person or entity responsible for granting access to, protecting, securing, operating, administering, or regulating part of the critical infrastructure (as defined in section 1016(e) of the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e))) to use E-Verify whenever hiring an individual for employment in the United States on or after the date that is 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. (5) Use of contract labor Any employer that uses a contract, subcontract, or exchange to obtain the labor of an individual in the United States after the applicable effective date under paragraphs (1) through (4) shall certify, in such contract, subcontract, or exchange, that the employer, and all parties to such contract, subcontract, or exchange, use E-Verify. (6) Transition rule Any person or other entity hiring, recruiting, or referring an individual for employment in the United States before the applicable effective date under paragraphs (1) through (4) shall be subject to any other provision of Federal law requiring the person or entity to participate in the E-Verify Pilot Program described in section 403(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note), as in effect before the date of the enactment of this Act, including Executive Order 13465 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note), and all references to the E-Verify Pilot Program or a requirement to participate in an employment verification program, shall be deemed to refer to the E-Verify program established under section 401 of such Act. (c)Early compliance(1)Former e-Verify required users, including Federal contractorsNotwithstanding the deadlines set forth in subsection (b)(1), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall require employers required to participate in E-Verify described in section 403(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note), including employers required to participate in such program by reason of Federal acquisition laws (and regulations promulgated under those laws, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation), to use E-Verify (and comply with any additional requirements of such Federal acquisition laws and regulation).(2)Former e-Verify voluntary users and others desiring early complianceNotwithstanding the deadlines set forth in subsection (b)(1), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide for the voluntary use of E-Verify by employers voluntarily electing to participate in the E-Verify program described in section 403(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) before such date, and by other employers seeking voluntary early compliance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.