Alabama · individual fact

Alabama education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher88.6%2020–2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher37.5%2020–2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher28.4%2020–2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 213.2205.2214.8224.4Alabama, 2003: 207.1Alabama, 2005: 207.8Alabama, 2007: 216.4Alabama, 2009: 216.3Alabama, 2011: 220.3Alabama, 2013: 218.6Alabama, 2015: 217Alabama, 2017: 216.4Alabama, 2019: 211.7Alabama, 2022: 213.3Alabama, 2024: 213.2200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderAlabama · Alabama approves school device and Internet-safety requirements · 2025-05-14Alabama FOCUS ActNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● Alabama Legislature · 7● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 4◆ Governor · 7■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

18 of 18 reviewed Alabama actions match · 18 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2024: 213.2 · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Alabama. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
2024213.2#33 of 50215
2022213.3#38 of 50217.5
2019211.7#47 of 50220.5
2017216.4#39 of 50221.9
2015217#40 of 50222.5
2013218.6#34 of 50221.8
2011220.3#31 of 50221.2
2009216.3#39 of 50220.9
2007216.4#38 of 50221
2005207.8#45 of 50219
2003207.1#45 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

Alabama · 2020–202488.6%
Alabama rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 88.6%2020–2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama · your comparison88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

88.6%2020–2024 estimate

Share of Alabama residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
Alabama · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

Alabama · 2024213.2
Alabama rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Alabama. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Grade 4 reading history in Alabama204.8214.8224.820032024
2024 · Alabama: 213.2 · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Grade 4 reading history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2003207.1
2005207.8
2007216.4
2009216.3
2011220.3
2013218.6
2015217
2017216.4
2019211.7
2022213.3
2024213.2

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 213.22024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama · your comparison213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

Alabama · FY2024$13,627
Alabama rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $13,627FY2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama · your comparison$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

Alabama · 2021–2288%
Alabama rank#13among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in Alabama72.5%83.5%94.6%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · Alabama: 88% · Rank #13 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2011–1275%
2012–1380%
2013–1486%
2014–1589%
2015–1687%
2016–1789%
2017–1890%
2018–1992%
2019–2091%
2020–2191%
2021–2288%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 88%2021–22 · Rank #13 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama · your comparison88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

Alabama · 2022–23$11,081
Alabama rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $11,0812022–23 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama · your comparison$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

54 statements from 13 candidates

2026 Alabama Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Corey Hill

2 statements

Republican · Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries · AL

Schools & education

“Regulations are hard on farmers. We’re going to work to maintain those at a low level,” Hill said. “The Sweet Grown Alabama program the ag department has done has been phenomenal and I want to continue to expand that. Right now, there’s a program where they take farmers’ food and sell it to the sch…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Douglas Mayor Corey Hill running for Ag commissioner in 2026

Candidate campaign source

“Regulations are hard on farmers. We’re going to work to maintain those at a low level,” Hill said. “The Sweet Grown Alabama program the ag department has done has been phenomenal and I want to continue to expand that. Right now, there’s a program where they take farmers’ food and sell it to the schools’ lunch rooms. I’d love to expand that program. There was a rural crime division at one time that ran through the ag department, I’d love to bring that back. A lot of times, somebody steals your cattle trailer or your cows, it’s tough to get your local PD or your Sheriff’s Office, and they had a division for that at one time. I’d love to get that back in place. That’s important to our rural folks in the county.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Corey Hill — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Corey Hill
Schools & education

Expand Farm-to-School Purchasing

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture Commissioner Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Expand Farm-to-School Purchasing

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Corey Hill — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Alabama Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 6 statements

Doug Jones

6 statements

Democratic · Governor · AL

Schools & education

Invest proceeds in Alabama priorities Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Invest proceeds in Alabama priorities Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
View 5 more statements from Doug Jones
Schools & education

Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

While politicians argue, Alabama loses hundreds of millions of dollars each year that could be invested in education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

While politicians argue, Alabama loses hundreds of millions of dollars each year that could be invested in education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials. Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Open doors to training, credentials, and careers Create paths like free community college for adults without credentials. Strengthen apprenticeship incentives so more people can earn while they learn.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗

2026 Alabama Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

John Wahl

3 statements

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · AL

Schools & education

Improving Education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Where John Stands

Candidate campaign source

Improving Education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Wahl — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from John Wahl
Schools & education

Education should be about academic excellence, not political indoctrination. John Wahl believes in returning control of our schools to parents and local teachers where it belongs. He supports school choice, so families can decide what’s best for their children – not government bureaucrats. John beli…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Where John Stands

Candidate campaign source

Education should be about academic excellence, not political indoctrination. John Wahl believes in returning control of our schools to parents and local teachers where it belongs. He supports school choice, so families can decide what’s best for their children – not government bureaucrats. John believes it’s time to get red-tap out of the classroom and supports Donald Trump’s efforts to abolish the Federal Department of Education. He’s committed to getting back to the basics: reading, writing, math, history, and civics — not critical race theory, gender ideology, or social activism. John will fight to make sure Alabama classrooms are places of learning, not political battlegrounds.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Wahl — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

Our children deserve innocence, not indoctrination. John Wahl is committed to keeping radical, left-wing ideology out of Alabama classrooms and public institutions. He will oppose efforts to introduce gender confusion, racial division, and sexualized content to our youth. John will fight to ensure t…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Where John Stands

Candidate campaign source

Our children deserve innocence, not indoctrination. John Wahl is committed to keeping radical, left-wing ideology out of Alabama classrooms and public institutions. He will oppose efforts to introduce gender confusion, racial division, and sexualized content to our youth. John will fight to ensure that schools and public policy reflect the values of Alabama families — not the agenda of Washington activists.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Wahl — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

11 matching sponsorships or proposals · 10 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Barbara Drummond

Alabama House of Representatives, District 103 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Barbara Drummond
Alabama Legislature · HB 103

Firearms; storage requirements provided; criminal penalty for violation resulting in possession by minor under certain circumstances, subject to exceptions

Feb 4, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Barbara Drummond · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require parents or guardians to reasonably secure firearms from minors and impose a misdemeanor when a storage violation leads to a minor unlawfully possessing a firearm at a public school, subject to specified exceptions. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-02-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (1) FIREARM. The term as defined in Section 13A-8-1, Code of Alabama 1975. (2) MINOR. An individual that is 18 years of age or younger. (3) PUBLIC SCHOOL. A public school composed of grades K-12, including a public school bus used for grades K-12. (4) REASONABLY SECURE. Includes, but is not limited to, storing a firearm using a trigger lock or in a locked box or gun safe that requires a key, numerical or alphanumerical combination, or fingerprint to open. (b) A parent or legal guardian of a minor shall store a firearm in his or her possession or under his or her control in a manner that reasonably secures the firearm from unauthorized or unlawful access by a minor. (c) If a minor gains access to a firearm and unlawfully possesses the firearm on the premises of a public school as a proximate result of a violation of subsection (b), the parent or legal guardian is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (d) This section shall not apply to any of the following: (1) A minor in possession of a firearm pursuant to Section 13A-11-72 (f) or (g), Code of Alabama 1975. (2) A minor in possession of a firearm that is in a motor vehicle while the vehicle is in a parking area owned or operated by a public school. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. M. Moore

Alabama House of Representatives, District 59 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. M. Moore
Alabama Legislature · HB 374

Relating to Medicaid; to expand the program to provide assistance to certain state residents; to direct the Alabama Medicaid Agency to implement the expansion; to direct other state agencies and entities to provide certain assistance; and to provide for appropriations for adequate funding.

Apr 25, 2023 · Not enacted

Rep. M. Moore · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would direct Alabama’s Medicaid Agency to implement Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and require state funding for the program. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Introduced and Referred (2023-04-25). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 2. (a) The Medicaid program shall provide assistance to all persons who apply for and are determined to be eligible for assistance and for whom federal matching funds are available to the state under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 4 of 2010, Public Law 111-152, March 30, 2010. (b) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall take all steps necessary to implement the Medicaid expansion program as provided for in subsection (a) and shall be the lead agency for the implementation in this state. The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall seek assistance from any state or federal agencies or entities to implement the program as appropriate, and all state agencies and entities shall provide assistance as requested by the agency. (c) The Legislature shall annually appropriate adequate funding to the Alabama Medicaid Agency for the purpose of implementing and operating the Medicaid expansion program pursuant to this section. Section 3. This act shall become effective immediately following its passage and approval by the Governor, or its otherwise becoming law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Robert B. Aderholt

U.S. House of Representatives, Alabama District 4 · R–AL

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Robert B. Aderholt
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · HR 9260

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

Jun 11, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Robert B. Aderholt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Sections 506–507 of this FY2027 appropriations proposal restrict its funds for abortion and abortion coverage, with rape, incest, and specified life-endangerment exceptions. It concerns financing and access; it cannot explain Alabama’s earlier resident-based abortion count.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 604. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced terminations for Alabama residents in 2024, including events in other states reported back to Alabama. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this resident-based measure, which does not capture every out-of-state event. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported induced terminations among Alabama residents · Adults with at least a high school diploma · People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

506. (a)None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for any abortion. (b)None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. (c)The term health benefits coverage means the package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement. 507. (a)The limitations established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion— (1)if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or (2)in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed. (b)Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as prohibiting the expenditure by a State, locality, entity, or private person of State, local, or private funds (other than a State's or locality's contribution of Medicaid matching funds). (c)Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with such a provider for such coverage with State funds (other than a State's or locality's contribution of Medicaid matching funds). (d) (1)None of the funds made available in this Act may be made available to a Federal agency or program, or to a State or local government, if such agency, program, or government subjects any institutional or individual health care entity to discrimination on the basis that the health care entity does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions. (2)In this subsection, the term health care entity includes an individual physician or other health care professional, a hospital, a provider-sponsored organization, a health maintenance organization, a health insurance plan, or any other kind of health care facility, organization, or plan.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · HR 5304

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

Sep 11, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Robert B. Aderholt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Sections 506–507 of this appropriations proposal restrict the use of its funds for abortion and abortion coverage, with exceptions for rape, incest, and specified danger to the woman’s life. This is a federal funding provision, not an Alabama occurrence count or a new statewide abortion ban.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 227. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced terminations for Alabama residents in 2024, including events in other states reported back to Alabama. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this resident-based measure, which does not capture every out-of-state event. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported induced terminations among Alabama residents · People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

506.(a)None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for any abortion.(b)None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion.(c)The term health benefits coverage means the package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.507.(a)The limitations established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion—(1)if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or(2)in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed.(b)Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as prohibiting the expenditure by a State, locality, entity, or private person of State, local, or private funds (other than a State's or locality's contribution of Medicaid matching funds).(c)Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with such a provider for such coverage with State funds (other than a State's or locality's contribution of Medicaid matching funds).(d)(1)None of the funds made available in this Act may be made available to a Federal agency or program, or to a State or local government, if such agency, program, or government subjects any institutional or individual health care entity to discrimination on the basis that the health care entity does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.(2)In this subsection, the term health care entity includes an individual physician or other health care professional, a hospital, a provider-sponsored organization, a health maintenance organization, a health insurance plan, or any other kind of health care facility, organization, or plan.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt

U.S. Senate, Alabama · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Katie Boyd Britt
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · S 1667

Homeless Children and Youth Act of 2025

May 7, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would broaden specified definitions of homelessness and eligibility for federal housing-assistance programs, including children, youth, and families identified through other federal programs. It concerns housing assistance and does not directly set rents among current cash-rent households.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Alabama’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Amendments to the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act(a)In generalThe McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 et seq.) is amended—(1)in section 103 (42 U.S.C. 11302)—(A)in subsection (a)—(i)in paragraph (5)(A)—(I)by striking are sharing and all that follows through charitable organizations,;(II)by striking 14 days each place that term appears and inserting 30 days;(III)in clause (i), by inserting or after the semicolon;(IV)by striking clause (ii); and(V)by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (ii); and(ii)by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows:(6)a child or youth defined as homeless under any other Federal program who, without further action by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, has been verified as homeless under any other Federal program by the director, designee of the director, or other person responsible for the implementation of a program established under this Act or any other Federal statute.; (B)in subsection (b), by striking fleeing and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: experiencing or has experienced domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking, or other dangerous or life threatening conditions, which has made it unsafe to remain in their current housing or caused homelessness.; and(C)by adding at the end the following:(f)Other definitionsIn this section—(1)the term child or youth defined as homeless under any other Federal program has the meaning given the term in section 401; and(2)the term other Federal statute has the meaning given the term in section 401.(g)Rule of constructionIf the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development promulgates rules, issues guidance, or sets forth conditions in any application, notice of funding availability, or other publication or advisory regarding the provisions of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that—(1)any individual defined as homeless under subsection (a) or (b) is eligible for any program or program component under this Act; and(2)all individuals defined as homeless under subsection (a) proposed to be served by an applicant, and all proposed program components or housing or service models, are given the same priority, points, or weight.;(2)in section 401 (42 U.S.C. 11360)—(A)in paragraph (1)(C)—(i)by striking clauses (ii) and (iv);(ii)by redesignating clauses (iii), (v), (vi), and (vii) as clauses (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v), respectively; and(iii)by striking the flush text following clause (v), as so redesignated;(B)in paragraph (2)(A)—(i)in clause (i), by striking and lives and all that follows through shelter and inserting under any provision of section 103;(ii)in clause (ii), by striking and living or residing in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter continuously and inserting under any provision of section 103; and(iii)in clause (iii)—(I)by striking (or a minor head of household if no adult is present in the household) and inserting or a minor head of household (if no adult is present in the household),; and(II)by inserting before the period at the end the following: , or has child with a disability, as defined in section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401), or an infant or toddler with a disability, as defined in section 632 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1432);(C)by striking paragraph (7);(D)by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (6) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively;(E)by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:(2)Child or youth defined as homeless under any other Federal programThe term child or youth defined as homeless under any other Federal program means—(A)a homeless child or youth, as defined in section 725, including any parent or guardian with whom the child or youth is living; and(B)a youth who—(i)is not more than 24 years of age;(ii)cannot live safely with a parent, legal guardian, or relative; and(iii)has no other safe alternative living arrangement.;(F)in paragraph (10)(A), by inserting any provision of before section 103;(G)by redesignating paragraphs (14) through (33) as paragraphs (15) through (34), respectively;(H)by inserting after paragraph (13) the following:(14)Other Federal statuteThe term other Federal statute includes—(A)the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 5701 et seq.);(B)the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.);(C)the Child Care and Development Block Grant of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858 et seq.);(D)subtitle N of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14043e et seq.);(E)section 330(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(h));(F)section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786);(G)the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.); and(H)the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.).;(I)in paragraph (32), as so redesignated, by inserting children under 5 years of age, youth and young adults between 14 and 24 years of age, after status, or age),;(J)in paragraph (33), as so redesignated, by inserting trafficking, after victims of; and(K)in paragraph (34), as so redesignated—(i)by inserting victims of trafficking, after assist;(ii)by striking stalking victims and inserting stalking; and(iii)by inserting trafficking, after concerning;(3)in section 402(f) (42 U.S.C. 11360a(f))—(A)in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting considering the prevalence and needs of homeless individuals, as defined under any provision of section 103 after involved; and(B)in paragraph (3)(D)—(i)in clause (v), by striking and at the end;(ii)by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (vii); and(iii)by inserting after clause (v) the following:(vi)the submission of HMIS data to the Secretary on at least an annual basis; and;(4)by inserting after section 408 (42 U.S.C. 11364) the following:409.Availability of HMIS data(a)In generalThe community-wide homeless management information system (in this section referred to as HMIS) data provided to the Secretary under section 402(f)(3)(D)(vi) shall be made publically available on the internet website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.(b)Required dataThe data publically available under subsection (a) shall be updated on at least an annual basis and shall include—(1)a cumulative count of the number of homeless individuals and families, as defined under any provision of section 103;(2)a cumulative assessment of the patterns of assistance provided under subtitles B and C for each geographic area involved;(3)a count of the number of homeless individuals and families, as defined under any provision of section 103, that are documented through the HMIS by each collaborative applicant; and(4)a count of the number of homeless women, as defined under any provision of section 103 and both unaccompanied and accompanied, including a breakout of the count by—(A)age range;(B)disability; and(C)length of time experiencing homelessness.;(5)in section 422 (42 U.S.C. 11382)—(A)in subsection (c)(1)(B), by striking establish and inserting demonstrate local, needs-based; and(B)by striking subsection (j) and inserting the following:(j)Rule of constructionIn awarding grants under subsection (a) and releasing a notification of funding availability under subsection (b), the Secretary shall—(1)without further action by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, ensure that any individual defined as homeless under any provision of section 103 is eligible for any program or program component under this Act;(2)ensure that homeless populations proposed to be served by the applicant, and proposed program components or housing or service models, are not awarded different priority, points, or weight; and(3)ensure that scoring is based primarily on the extent to which the applicant demonstrates that the project and program components—(A)would meet the priorities identified in the plan submitted under section 427(b)(1)(B); and(B)are cost-effective in meeting the overall goals and objectives identified in that plan.;(6)in section 424(d) (42 U.S.C. 11384(d)), by striking paragraph (5);(7)in section 425(c) (42 U.S.C. 11385(c)), by striking and (G) providing and inserting (G) providing transportation to employment, early care and education programs, career and technical education programs, and health and mental health care services, and (H) providing;(8)in section 426(b) (42 U.S.C. 11386(b))—(A)in paragraph (4), by amending subparagraph (D) to read as follows:(D)in the case of programs providing housing or services to families or youth, they will designate a staff person to be responsible for ensuring that children and youth being served in the program are—(i)enrolled in school and connected to appropriate services in the community, including Head Start, services provided under part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.), programs authorized under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858 et seq.), career and technical education, and services provided by local educational agency liaisons designated under subtitle B of title VII of this Act; and(ii)in the case of an unaccompanied youth, as defined in section 725, informed of their status as an independent student under section 480 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv) and receive verification of such status for purposes of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid described in section 483 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1090); and;(B)in paragraph (6), by inserting the actual compliance with the certifications required under paragraph (4) and after Secretary; and(C)in paragraph (7)—(i)by inserting and youth after needs of children;(ii)by inserting or unaccompanied youth after when families;(iii)by inserting and unaccompanied youth after with children; and(iv)by striking such children's and inserting such children and youth's;(9)in section 427(b) (42 U.S.C. 11386a(b))—(A)in paragraph (1)—(i)in subparagraph (A)—(I)in clause (vi), by adding and at the end;(II)in clause (vii), by striking and at the end; and(III)by striking clause (viii);(ii)in subparagraph (B)—(I)by amending clause (iii) to read as follows:(iii)how the recipient will collaborate with local educational agencies, early care and education programs, and institutions of higher education to assist in the identification of and services to youth and families who become or remain homeless, including the steps the recipient will take to inform youth and families of their eligibility for services under part B of subtitle VII of this Act, the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.), the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858 et seq.), and the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.);; and(II)by striking clause (v) and inserting the following:(v)how the recipient will ensure the full implementation of the certifications and agreements described in paragraphs (4)(D) and (7) of section 426(b);;(iii)in subparagraph (C)(i), by inserting and appropriate after rapid; and(iv)by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following:(F)for communities that establish and operate a centralized or coordinated assessment system, the extent to which that system—(i)ensures that individuals who are most in need of assistance receive it in a timely manner;(ii)in assessing need under clause (i), uses separate, specific, age-appropriate criteria for assessing the safety and needs of children under 5 years of age, school-age children, unaccompanied youth and young adults between 14 and 24 years of age, and families that are unrelated to the criteria through which an individual qualifies as homeless under section 103;(iii)is accessible to unaccompanied youth and homeless families;(iv)diverts individuals to safe, stable, age-appropriate accommodations; and(v)includes affordable housing developers, youth service providers, early childhood programs, local educational agencies, and mental health organizations; and(G)such other factors as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to carry out this subtitle in an effective and efficient manner, except that such factors may not have the effect of prioritizing or weighting, unless justified by local data or information contained in a plan submitted under subparagraph (B)—(i)any service with respect to a specific subpopulation of homeless individuals over another; or(ii)any program component or housing or service model over another.; and(B)by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:(3)Homelessness countsThe Secretary shall require that communities that conduct an annual count of homeless people shall count all homeless individuals identified and reported by any program funded under any provision of this Act or any other Federal statute.;(10)in section 428 (42 U.S.C. 11386b)—(A)in subsection (a)(1)—(i)by striking disabilities and and inserting disabilities,; and(ii)by inserting , and homeless families where a child has a disability before the period at the end;(B)in subsection (d)—(i)in paragraph (1), by inserting promoting before independent; and(ii)by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following:(2)ProhibitionThe Secretary shall not provide bonuses or other incentives under paragraph (1) that have the effect of prioritizing or weighting, unless justified by local data or information contained in a plan submitted under section 427(b)(1)(B)—(A)any service with respect to a specific subpopulation of homeless individuals over another; or(B)any program component or housing or service model over another.(3)Rule of constructionFor purposes of this subsection, activities that have been proven to be effective at reducing homelessness generally or reducing homelessness for a specific subpopulation include any activity determined by the Secretary, after providing notice and an opportunity for public comment, to have been proven effective at—(A)reducing homelessness generally;(B)reducing homelessness for a specific subpopulation;(C)reducing homelessness in a community for populations overrepresented in any counts conducted in that community under section 427(b)(3); or(D)achieving homeless prevention, reducing recidivism, and promoting self-sufficiency and independent living.(4)Encouraging local success and innovationIn providing bonuses or incentives under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall seek to encourage the implementation of proven strategies and innovation in reducing homelessness among the local priority populations identified in the plan submitted by an applicant under section 427(b)(1)(B). The Secretary shall not implement bonuses or incentives that promote a national priority established by the Secretary.; and(C)by striking subsection (e); and(11)by amending section 434 (42 U.S.C. 11388) to read as follows:434.Reports to Congress(a)In generalThe Secretary shall submit to Congress an annual report, which shall—(1)summarize the activities carried out under this subtitle and set forth the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Secretary as a result of the activities;(2)include, for the year preceding the date on which the report is submitted—(A)data required to be made publically available in the report under section 409; and(B)data on programs funded under any other Federal statute; and(3)provide information on—(A)the extent to which the data collected under section 427(b)(3) may be duplicative; and(B)the policies and practices employed to account for such duplication, where applicable, to ensure an accurate point-in-time count.(b)TimingA report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than 4 months after the end of each fiscal year..(b)Technical and conforming amendmentThe table of contents in section 101(b) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 note) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 408 the following:Sec. 409. Availability of HMIS data..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Matt Woods

Alabama Senate, District 5 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Matt Woods
Alabama Legislature · HB 266

Restoring Educational Advancement of Completing High School (REACH) Act, providing for a nontraditional high school diploma option for students 17 years of age and older who withdraw from school through the Adult Education Division of the Alabama Community College System; to provide for the sharing of data on students who drop out of high school; and to provide that participating students are eligible for driver's licenses

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Matt Woods · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The REACH Act establishes a nontraditional high-school diploma pathway through the Alabama Community College System for people age 18 or older who withdrew before graduating. The enrolled text’s age 18 controls over the older index description saying 17. This can concern adult attainment without establishing a change in the measured percentage.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c)(1) The ACCS, in collaboration with the State Superintendent of Education, shall establish a nontraditional high school diploma option for students who are 18 years of age or older and who have withdrawn from high school before graduating pursuant to Section 16-28-3.1, Code of Alabama 1975, as a means for those students to earn a high school diploma. (2) The ACCS shall develop, implement, and continually evaluate the effectiveness of the nontraditional high school diploma option program to ensure that the curricula of the program is aligned with public high school diploma requirements. The ACCS shall also oversee the management and control of each nontraditional high school diploma option program offered. (d)(1) The ACCS, through its network of community and technical colleges, shall work with local education agencies throughout the state to implement the nontraditional high school diploma option at the local level. Local education agencies shall actively promote the availability of the nontraditional high school diploma option to at-risk juniors and seniors. Additionally, the Adult Education Division of the ACCS, in conjunction with the department, shall oversee a statewide awareness campaign to ensure that students, parents, and educators throughout the state are informed about the opportunities and supports available through this program. (2) Adult education providers approved by the ACCS and public high schools may enter into agreements regarding student participation in nontraditional high school diploma options that include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Location and manner of instructional delivery including, but not limited to, in-person, virtual, or a hybrid. b. Reasonable accomodations for participants. c. Appropriate support services for participants. (e)(1) A student who withdraws from high school, and, within one year after withdrawing enrolls in a nontraditional high school diploma option program, may not be counted as a dropout for purposes of the graduation rate calculations of his or her high school on the State Report Card. (2) The ACCS, in collaboration with the department and local education agencies, shall track program participation, student retention, and high school diplomas awarded through the nontraditional high school diploma option to measure the effectiveness of the program. Commencing on January 1, 2026, and each January 1 thereafter, the Chancellor of the ACCS shall submit a summary of the information tracked to the Chairs of the House and Senate Education Policy Committees. (f) Students who earn a high school diploma through the nontraditional high school diploma option are eligible for admission to any two-year or four-year institution of higher education in the state; provided, however, each institution shall maintain the ability to set its own admission requirements. (g) The Board of Trustees of the ACCS and the State Board of Education may adopt reasonable rules to implement this section including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Allowing an increase to the credit ratio for completion of postsecondary level instructional curricula related to career readiness, career pathways, and integrated education and training correlated to industry recognized credentials. (2) Utilization of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act; the Title II Adult Education and Family Literacy Act; and Measurable Skill Gain indicators as referenced by the United States Department of Education Office of Community, Technical, and Adult Education to accelerate the achievement of a high school diploma. (3) Agreed upon state strategies to reduce the dropout rate by using the Adult Education Division of the Alabama Community College System network of providers as the primary option of choice for students who have withdrawn from high school to complete a high school diploma or its recognized equivalent.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman

Alabama Senate, District 18 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman
Alabama Legislature · SB 364

Public K-12 education; violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation instruction required before graduation from high school beginning in sixth grade, State Board of Education required to adopt standards

Apr 17, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Beginning with the 2027–2028 school year, the law requires public school students to complete violence-prevention, conflict-resolution, and mediation instruction before high-school graduation. It addresses future diploma requirements and a school-violence prevention mechanism; it cannot explain the earlier adult-attainment or crime measurements.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2026-04-17). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. Section 16-40-13 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §16-40-13 (a) Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, each public school student shall complete a course or program in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation before graduation from high school. The instruction shall be provided to students in grades six through twelve and shall include a discussion of or instruction in all of the following: (1) Responsible decision-making. (2) The causes and effects of school violence and harassment, cultural diversity, and nonviolent methods for resolving conflict, including peer mediation. (3) The consequences of violent behavior. (4) The causes of violent reactions to conflict. (5) Nonviolent conflict resolution techniques. (6) The relationship between drugs, alcohol, and violence. (7) The implementation of voluntary peer mediation programs and the integration of conflict resolution models in classrooms. (b) Before June 30, 2027, the State Department of Education shall prepare and make available to all local boards of education instructional materials, models, and curricula that may be used as guidelines for development of a violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation course or program. Each local board of education shall determine the appropriate curriculum for satisfying the requirements of this section. The State Department of Education shall assist in training teachers to provide effective instruction in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation. (c) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules as necessary to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2026. ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB364 Senate 01-Apr-26 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate. Patrick Harris, Secretary. House of Representatives Passed: 09-Apr-26 By: Senator Smitherman
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.