Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Alabama public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate380.8 per 100k2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,642.2 per 100k2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99%2024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Alabama over time
Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
25 of 25 reviewed Alabama actions match · 22 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.
Alabama · 2024: 380.8 per 100k · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Alabama's average monthly population coverage was below 90% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, at 65.2%, 71.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. Those years are flagged and should not be treated as directly comparable with the higher-coverage years. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Alabama Reported violent-crime rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Alabama · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
Alabama · 2024380.8 per 100k
Alabama rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Alabama's average monthly population coverage was below 90% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, at 65.2%, 71.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. Those years are flagged and should not be treated as directly comparable with the higher-coverage years. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 380.8 per 100k · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2015
471.2 per 100k
2016
528.2 per 100k
2017
516.3 per 100k
2018
519 per 100k
2019
255 per 100k
2020
278.8 per 100k
2021
338.4 per 100k
2022
399.6 per 100k
2023
404.7 per 100k
2024
380.8 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 380.8 per 100k2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama · your comparison
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Alabama's average monthly population coverage was below 90% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, at 65.2%, 71.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. Those years are flagged and should not be treated as directly comparable with the higher-coverage years.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Alabama's average monthly population coverage was below 90% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, at 65.2%, 71.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. Those years are flagged and should not be treated as directly comparable with the higher-coverage years.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
Alabama · 20241,212
Alabama rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 1,2122024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama · your comparison
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
25 of 25 reviewed Alabama actions · newest first
Apr 17, 2026 · SB 364 · Public K-12 education; violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation instruction required before graduation from high school beginning in sixth grade, State Board of Education required to adopt standards · EnactedAlabama Legislature · SB 364
Public K-12 education; violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation instruction required before graduation from high school beginning in sixth grade, State Board of Education required to adopt standards
Apr 17, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Beginning with the 2027–2028 school year, the law requires public school students to complete violence-prevention, conflict-resolution, and mediation instruction before high-school graduation. It addresses future diploma requirements and a school-violence prevention mechanism; it cannot explain the earlier adult-attainment or crime measurements.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2026-04-17). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 16-40-13 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §16-40-13 (a) Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, each public school student shall complete a course or program in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation before graduation from high school. The instruction shall be provided to students in grades six through twelve and shall include a discussion of or instruction in all of the following: (1) Responsible decision-making. (2) The causes and effects of school violence and harassment, cultural diversity, and nonviolent methods for resolving conflict, including peer mediation. (3) The consequences of violent behavior. (4) The causes of violent reactions to conflict. (5) Nonviolent conflict resolution techniques. (6) The relationship between drugs, alcohol, and violence. (7) The implementation of voluntary peer mediation programs and the integration of conflict resolution models in classrooms. (b) Before June 30, 2027, the State Department of Education shall prepare and make available to all local boards of education instructional materials, models, and curricula that may be used as guidelines for development of a violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation course or program. Each local board of education shall determine the appropriate curriculum for satisfying the requirements of this section. The State Department of Education shall assist in training teachers to provide effective instruction in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation. (c) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules as necessary to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2026. ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB364 Senate 01-Apr-26 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate. Patrick Harris, Secretary. House of Representatives Passed: 09-Apr-26 By: Senator Smitherman
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 16, 2026 · SB 364 · Public K-12 education; violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation instruction required before graduation from high school beginning in sixth grade, State Board of Education required to adopt standards · SignedGovernor · SB 364
Public K-12 education; violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation instruction required before graduation from high school beginning in sixth grade, State Board of Education required to adopt standards
Apr 16, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kay Ivey · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kay Ivey signed SB 364. Beginning with the 2027–2028 school year, the law requires public school students to complete violence-prevention, conflict-resolution, and mediation instruction before high-school graduation. It addresses future diploma requirements and a school-violence prevention mechanism; it cannot explain the earlier adult-attainment or crime measurements.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 16-40-13 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §16-40-13 (a) Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, each public school student shall complete a course or program in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation before graduation from high school. The instruction shall be provided to students in grades six through twelve and shall include a discussion of or instruction in all of the following: (1) Responsible decision-making. (2) The causes and effects of school violence and harassment, cultural diversity, and nonviolent methods for resolving conflict, including peer mediation. (3) The consequences of violent behavior. (4) The causes of violent reactions to conflict. (5) Nonviolent conflict resolution techniques. (6) The relationship between drugs, alcohol, and violence. (7) The implementation of voluntary peer mediation programs and the integration of conflict resolution models in classrooms. (b) Before June 30, 2027, the State Department of Education shall prepare and make available to all local boards of education instructional materials, models, and curricula that may be used as guidelines for development of a violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation course or program. Each local board of education shall determine the appropriate curriculum for satisfying the requirements of this section. The State Department of Education shall assist in training teachers to provide effective instruction in violence prevention, conflict resolution, and mediation. (c) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules as necessary to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2026. ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB364 Senate 01-Apr-26 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate. Patrick Harris, Secretary. House of Representatives Passed: 09-Apr-26 By: Senator Smitherman
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 11, 2026 · SB 242 · Commercial driver licenses; possession of United States work authorization for certain commercial driver license holders required, proficiency in the English language for commercial motor vehicle required, procedures for impoundment provided for, offense of presenting a false foreign commercial driver license established, offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation established, penalties provided for · EnactedAlabama Legislature · SB 242
Commercial driver licenses; possession of United States work authorization for certain commercial driver license holders required, proficiency in the English language for commercial motor vehicle required, procedures for impoundment provided for, offense of presenting a false foreign commercial driver license established, offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation established, penalties provided for
Mar 11, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Lance Bell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law establishes documentation requirements and penalties for drivers holding foreign commercial licenses and requires English proficiency for commercial-vehicle operation. The reviewed provision concerns a subset of foreign-born residents and drivers, not everyone born outside the United States.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2026-03-11). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§32-6-49.63 (a) An individual commits the offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation if the individual knowingly: (1) Holds a valid commercial driver license issued by a foreign government; and (2) Does not have the additional entry documents required under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(b)(4) in his or her immediate possession while operating a commercial motor vehicle. (b)(1) Except as provided in subdivision (2), a violation of this section is a Class D felony and subject to any of the following: a. The impounding of the commercial motor vehicle. b. A one thousand dollar ($1,000) fine for the driver. c. A two thousand dollar ($2,000) fine for the commercial motor carrier. (2) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor if the individual establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time the offense was committed, the individual had been issued the additional entry documents required under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(b)(4). §32-6-49.64 (a) An operator of a commercial motor vehicle shall be able to read and speak the English language sufficiently to meet the English language proficiency requirements under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11. (b) An individual commits the offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without sufficient English language proficiency if the individual: (1) Operates a commercial motor vehicle; and (2) Fails to demonstrate proficiency in the English language as required under subsection (a). (c)(1) For a first violation of this section, a person who violates this section is guilty of a traffic violation, which shall be punished by a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) for the operator, a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the commercial motor carrier, and the impoundment of the commercial motor vehicle if it is determined that the operator or the commercial motor vehicle poses a threat to public safety. (2) A second or subsequent violation of this section shall be punished by a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the operator, a fine of up to four thousand dollars ($4,000) for the commercial motor carrier, and the impoundment of the commercial motor vehicle. (d)(1) The law enforcement officer making the impoundment shall direct an approved towing service to tow the commercial motor vehicle to the garage of the towing service, storage lot, or other place of safety and maintain custody and control of the commercial motor vehicle until the registered owner or authorized agent of the registered owner claims the commercial motor vehicle by paying all reasonable and customary towing and storage fees for the services of the towing company. The commercial motor vehicle shall then be released to the registered owner or an agent of the owner. (2) Any towing service or towing company removing the commercial motor vehicle at the direction of the law enforcement officer in accordance with this section shall have a lien on the commercial motor vehicle for all reasonable and customary fees relating to the towing and storage of the commercial motor vehicle. This lien shall be subject and subordinate to all prior security interests and other liens affecting the commercial motor vehicle whether evidenced on the certificate of title or otherwise. Notice of any sale or other proceedings relative to this lien shall be given to the holders of all prior security interest or other liens by official service of process at least 15 days prior to any sale or other proceedings. (3) Any person in possession of a commercial motor vehicle impounded pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 13 of Title 32, relating to the impoundment and sale of abandoned vehicles; Section 32-8-84, relating to the procedures for unclaimed vehicles; and Section 41-27-61, relating to the procedures for freight retrieval of impounded commercial vehicles.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 11, 2026 · SB 242 · Commercial driver licenses; possession of United States work authorization for certain commercial driver license holders required, proficiency in the English language for commercial motor vehicle required, procedures for impoundment provided for, offense of presenting a false foreign commercial driver license established, offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation established, penalties provided for · SignedGovernor · SB 242
Commercial driver licenses; possession of United States work authorization for certain commercial driver license holders required, proficiency in the English language for commercial motor vehicle required, procedures for impoundment provided for, offense of presenting a false foreign commercial driver license established, offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation established, penalties provided for
Mar 11, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kay Ivey · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kay Ivey signed SB 242. The law establishes documentation requirements and penalties for drivers holding foreign commercial licenses and requires English proficiency for commercial-vehicle operation. The reviewed provision concerns a subset of foreign-born residents and drivers, not everyone born outside the United States.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§32-6-49.63 (a) An individual commits the offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without proper documentation if the individual knowingly: (1) Holds a valid commercial driver license issued by a foreign government; and (2) Does not have the additional entry documents required under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(b)(4) in his or her immediate possession while operating a commercial motor vehicle. (b)(1) Except as provided in subdivision (2), a violation of this section is a Class D felony and subject to any of the following: a. The impounding of the commercial motor vehicle. b. A one thousand dollar ($1,000) fine for the driver. c. A two thousand dollar ($2,000) fine for the commercial motor carrier. (2) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor if the individual establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time the offense was committed, the individual had been issued the additional entry documents required under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(b)(4). §32-6-49.64 (a) An operator of a commercial motor vehicle shall be able to read and speak the English language sufficiently to meet the English language proficiency requirements under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11. (b) An individual commits the offense of operating a commercial motor vehicle without sufficient English language proficiency if the individual: (1) Operates a commercial motor vehicle; and (2) Fails to demonstrate proficiency in the English language as required under subsection (a). (c)(1) For a first violation of this section, a person who violates this section is guilty of a traffic violation, which shall be punished by a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) for the operator, a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the commercial motor carrier, and the impoundment of the commercial motor vehicle if it is determined that the operator or the commercial motor vehicle poses a threat to public safety. (2) A second or subsequent violation of this section shall be punished by a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the operator, a fine of up to four thousand dollars ($4,000) for the commercial motor carrier, and the impoundment of the commercial motor vehicle. (d)(1) The law enforcement officer making the impoundment shall direct an approved towing service to tow the commercial motor vehicle to the garage of the towing service, storage lot, or other place of safety and maintain custody and control of the commercial motor vehicle until the registered owner or authorized agent of the registered owner claims the commercial motor vehicle by paying all reasonable and customary towing and storage fees for the services of the towing company. The commercial motor vehicle shall then be released to the registered owner or an agent of the owner. (2) Any towing service or towing company removing the commercial motor vehicle at the direction of the law enforcement officer in accordance with this section shall have a lien on the commercial motor vehicle for all reasonable and customary fees relating to the towing and storage of the commercial motor vehicle. This lien shall be subject and subordinate to all prior security interests and other liens affecting the commercial motor vehicle whether evidenced on the certificate of title or otherwise. Notice of any sale or other proceedings relative to this lien shall be given to the holders of all prior security interest or other liens by official service of process at least 15 days prior to any sale or other proceedings. (3) Any person in possession of a commercial motor vehicle impounded pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 13 of Title 32, relating to the impoundment and sale of abandoned vehicles; Section 32-8-84, relating to the procedures for unclaimed vehicles; and Section 41-27-61, relating to the procedures for freight retrieval of impounded commercial vehicles.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 19, 2026 · HB 80 · Evictions, law enforcement role, notices to tenants · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · HB 80
Evictions, law enforcement role, notices to tenants
Feb 19, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Mack Butler · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The introduced proposal would require an eviction notice describing possession, appeal, and property-disposal consequences, plus a posted warning at least 24 hours before officers execute the writ of possession. It also defines officers’ duties and civil immunity. This concerns notice and possession procedures affecting tenancy, rather than the amount of monthly rent. It did not become law.
Read Second Time in Second House. Latest official history entry: Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar (2026-02-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Alabama’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) The notice shall contain the following language: "EVICTION NOTICE. You are being sued for eviction. At the eviction hearing, the judge will determine if the landlord is entitled to possession of your rental unit. If the landlord is granted possession of the rental unit, then you will have at least seven days from the date of the judgment to move out or appeal the eviction. If you move out by the date ordered by the court and leave personal property behind, the landlord may dispose of such abandoned property without further notice. If you do not move out by the date and time ordered by the court, the landlord may have you removed by law enforcement and the landlord may remove any personal property remaining on the premises to the curb or an area designated for garbage. The landlord will have no obligation to preserve the personal property upon removal." […] §6-6-338 (a) An officer authorized to execute a writ of possession issued pursuant to Section 6-6-337 shall post a written warning of at least 8 1/2 by 11 inches on the exterior of the front door of the rental unit notifying the tenant that the writ has been issued and that the writ will be executed on or after a specific date and time stated in the warning, which date is not sooner than 24 hours after the warning is posted. (b) Upon execution of the writ, the officer shall: (1) Instruct the tenant and all individuals occupying the property to leave the premises immediately; (2) Keep the peace while the plaintiff, owner, landlord, or their authorized agent of the plaintiff, owner, or landlord, changes the locks and removes the personal property of the unlawful occupants from the premises to the curb or property line; and (3) If the tenant or other individuals on the property fail to comply, physically remove them from the premises. (c) An officer may use reasonable force in executing a writ under this section. (d) The following persons are immune from any claim that seeks to impose civil liability for damages to the defendant or the defendant's property resulting from the execution of a writ under this section: (1) Any officer or individual acting under the officer's supervision who executes the writ in good faith and with reasonable diligence. (2) The plaintiff, owner, or landlord for whom the writ was issued. (3) Any agent of the plaintiff, owner, or landlord for whom the writ was issued. (e) A person described in subsection (d) does not have a duty to store or protect the tenant's property during or after execution of the writ of possession and may dispose of any property remaining on the premises after execution without further notice or legal liability.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 5, 2026 · SB 267 · Firearms; permit to carry pistol, criminal penalties, exempt persons, established; carrying pistol on employer's property revised; nonsubstantive conforming changes to code · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · SB 267
Firearms; permit to carry pistol, criminal penalties, exempt persons, established; carrying pistol on employer's property revised; nonsubstantive conforming changes to code
Feb 5, 2026 · Not enacted
Sen. Bobby D. Singleton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would restore a permit requirement for carrying a pistol in a vehicle or on one’s person beginning January 1, 2027, with specified home, property, business, transport, and other exemptions. It did not become law.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-02-05). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 13A-11-74.2 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §13A-11-74.2 (a) Beginning January 1, 2027, except as provided in subsection (b), an individual may not carry a pistol in any vehicle or on his or her person unless the individual possesses a valid carry permit issued pursuant to Section 13A-11-75 or recognized pursuant to 13A-11-85. (b) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) The carrying of a pistol by an individual on land under his or her control. (2) The carrying of a pistol by an individual in his or her place of residence. (3) The carrying of a pistol by an individual in his or her fixed place of business. (4) The carrying of an unloaded pistol in a motor vehicle if the pistol is locked in a compartment or container that is in or affixed securely to the vehicle and out of reach of the driver and any passenger in the vehicle. (c) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. Section 2. Sections 13A-11-74, 13A-11-75, 13A-11-85, and 13A-11-90, Code of Alabama 1975, are amended to read as follows: "§13A-11-74 Section 13A-11-74.2 shall not apply to any of the following: (1) Marshals, sheriffs, prison and jail wardens, and their regularly employed deputies, police officers, and other law enforcement officers of any state or political subdivision thereof. (2) Any member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Space Force of the United States or of the National Guard, or to any member of the National Guard organized reserves or state guard organizations when on duty or going to or from duty. (3) The regularly enrolled members of any organization authorized to purchase or receive weapons from the United States or from this state , provided that those members are at or are going to or from their places of assembly or target practices. (4) Officers or employees of the United States authorized to carry a pistol. (5) Any person engaged in manufacturing, repairing, or dealing in pistols, or the agent or representative of a person possessing, using, or carrying a pistol in the usual or ordinary course of pistol manufacturing, repairing, or dealing business. (6) Any common carrier, except taxicabs, licensed as a common carrier. (7) Any person permitted by law to possess a pistol while carrying it unloaded in a secure wrapper, from the place of purchase to his or her home or place of business, or to or from a place of repair or in moving from one place of abode or business to another."
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Alabama officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
21 statements from 12 candidates
2026 Alabama Attorney General — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements
From scams that target seniors to fraud that drains working families, the Attorney General is your first line of defense. Jeff will use the full power of the office to protect Alabama consumers, crack down on those who prey on the vulnerable, and stand up for victims — work he began in the Legislatu…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protect Alabama families.
Candidate campaign source
From scams that target seniors to fraud that drains working families, the Attorney General is your first line of defense. Jeff will use the full power of the office to protect Alabama consumers, crack down on those who prey on the vulnerable, and stand up for victims — work he began in the Legislature strengthening protections against domestic violence and crimes against children.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Protect Alabama families. From scams that target seniors to fraud that drains working families, the Attorney General is your first line of defense. Jeff will use the full power of the office to protect Alabama consumers, crack down on those who prey on the vulnerable, and stand up for victims — work…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Root out corruption.
Candidate campaign source
Protect Alabama families. From scams that target seniors to fraud that drains working families, the Attorney General is your first line of defense. Jeff will use the full power of the office to protect Alabama consumers, crack down on those who prey on the vulnerable, and stand up for victims — work he began in the Legislature strengthening protections against domestic violence and crimes against children.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Safe communities are the foundation of a strong society. John Wahl supports our law enforcement officers and believes in holding criminals accountable. He will work to make every one of our communities is safer, and expand resources for local police and first responders. John also supports measures …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Where John Stands
Candidate campaign source
Safe communities are the foundation of a strong society. John Wahl supports our law enforcement officers and believes in holding criminals accountable. He will work to make every one of our communities is safer, and expand resources for local police and first responders. John also supports measures to combat human trafficking and protect our most vulnerable citizens.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Jerry Carl believes that defunding the police and other soft-on-crime policies have led to higher crime rates and put families at risk. In Congress, Jerry has always been a strong supporter of law enforcement, making sure our hard-working police officers have the support they need to do their jobs. …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Back the Blue & Keep Us Safe
Candidate campaign source
Jerry Carl believes that defunding the police and other soft-on-crime policies have led to higher crime rates and put families at risk. In Congress, Jerry has always been a strong supporter of law enforcement, making sure our hard-working police officers have the support they need to do their jobs. Jerry will always support cops over criminals.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Alabama incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
16 matching sponsorships or proposals · 13 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Barbara Drummond
Alabama House of Representatives, District 103 · D–AL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Barbara DrummondAlabama Legislature · HB 103
Firearms; storage requirements provided; criminal penalty for violation resulting in possession by minor under certain circumstances, subject to exceptions
Feb 4, 2025 · Not enacted
Rep. Barbara Drummond · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would require parents or guardians to reasonably secure firearms from minors and impose a misdemeanor when a storage violation leads to a minor unlawfully possessing a firearm at a public school, subject to specified exceptions. It did not become law.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-02-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (1) FIREARM. The term as defined in Section 13A-8-1, Code of Alabama 1975. (2) MINOR. An individual that is 18 years of age or younger. (3) PUBLIC SCHOOL. A public school composed of grades K-12, including a public school bus used for grades K-12. (4) REASONABLY SECURE. Includes, but is not limited to, storing a firearm using a trigger lock or in a locked box or gun safe that requires a key, numerical or alphanumerical combination, or fingerprint to open. (b) A parent or legal guardian of a minor shall store a firearm in his or her possession or under his or her control in a manner that reasonably secures the firearm from unauthorized or unlawful access by a minor. (c) If a minor gains access to a firearm and unlawfully possesses the firearm on the premises of a public school as a proximate result of a violation of subsection (b), the parent or legal guardian is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (d) This section shall not apply to any of the following: (1) A minor in possession of a firearm pursuant to Section 13A-11-72 (f) or (g), Code of Alabama 1975. (2) A minor in possession of a firearm that is in a motor vehicle while the vehicle is in a parking area owned or operated by a public school. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2025.
U.S. House of Representatives, Alabama District 1 · R–AL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Barry MooreU.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · HR 6155
Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act
Nov 19, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Barry Moore · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act proposal would replace the general intent-to-cause-death-or-serious-harm element with a knowing standard and revise the death-resulting provision. Carjacking by force concerns robbery, a violent-crime component; it is not automatically counted as ordinary motor-vehicle theft in the property-crime series.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Motor vehiclesSection 2119 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking , with the intent to cause death or serious bodily harm and inserting knowingly; and(2)in paragraph (3), by striking if death results, and inserting if the motor vehicle is taken with the intent to cause death or serious bodily harm, and death results,.
Evictions, law enforcement role, notices to tenants
Feb 19, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Mack Butler · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The introduced proposal would require an eviction notice describing possession, appeal, and property-disposal consequences, plus a posted warning at least 24 hours before officers execute the writ of possession. It also defines officers’ duties and civil immunity. This concerns notice and possession procedures affecting tenancy, rather than the amount of monthly rent. It did not become law.
Read Second Time in Second House. Latest official history entry: Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar (2026-02-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Alabama’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) The notice shall contain the following language: "EVICTION NOTICE. You are being sued for eviction. At the eviction hearing, the judge will determine if the landlord is entitled to possession of your rental unit. If the landlord is granted possession of the rental unit, then you will have at least seven days from the date of the judgment to move out or appeal the eviction. If you move out by the date ordered by the court and leave personal property behind, the landlord may dispose of such abandoned property without further notice. If you do not move out by the date and time ordered by the court, the landlord may have you removed by law enforcement and the landlord may remove any personal property remaining on the premises to the curb or an area designated for garbage. The landlord will have no obligation to preserve the personal property upon removal." […] §6-6-338 (a) An officer authorized to execute a writ of possession issued pursuant to Section 6-6-337 shall post a written warning of at least 8 1/2 by 11 inches on the exterior of the front door of the rental unit notifying the tenant that the writ has been issued and that the writ will be executed on or after a specific date and time stated in the warning, which date is not sooner than 24 hours after the warning is posted. (b) Upon execution of the writ, the officer shall: (1) Instruct the tenant and all individuals occupying the property to leave the premises immediately; (2) Keep the peace while the plaintiff, owner, landlord, or their authorized agent of the plaintiff, owner, or landlord, changes the locks and removes the personal property of the unlawful occupants from the premises to the curb or property line; and (3) If the tenant or other individuals on the property fail to comply, physically remove them from the premises. (c) An officer may use reasonable force in executing a writ under this section. (d) The following persons are immune from any claim that seeks to impose civil liability for damages to the defendant or the defendant's property resulting from the execution of a writ under this section: (1) Any officer or individual acting under the officer's supervision who executes the writ in good faith and with reasonable diligence. (2) The plaintiff, owner, or landlord for whom the writ was issued. (3) Any agent of the plaintiff, owner, or landlord for whom the writ was issued. (e) A person described in subsection (d) does not have a duty to store or protect the tenant's property during or after execution of the writ of possession and may dispose of any property remaining on the premises after execution without further notice or legal liability.
Firearms, to prohibit possession of pistols with parts installed to convert into machine gun
Feb 4, 2025 · Not enacted
Rep. Phillip Ensler · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would prohibit knowingly possessing a pistol fitted with parts designed or intended to convert it into a machine gun. Exceptions cover official state or local law-enforcement activity, specified federally registered or registration-exempt items, and devices that do not enable more than two shots per trigger function. It did not become law.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-02-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For the purposes of this section, the term "machine gun" means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machine gun, and any combination of parts from which a machine gun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person. (b) No person shall knowingly own or have in his or her possession, control, care, or custody a pistol that has a part or combination of parts designed or intended to convert a pistol into a machine gun installed on or attached to the pistol. (c) A violation of this section is a Class C felony. (d) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) A state or local law enforcement officer while acting in an official capacity. (2) A person who owns or has in his or her possession, control, care, or custody a firearm, part, or combination of parts that are registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record maintained by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives or is otherwise not subject to that registration requirement. (3) Any part, combination of parts, or device designed or intended to increase a pistol's rate of fire but that does not enable a semiautomatic pistol to fire more than two shots, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2025.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Bobby D. SingletonAlabama Legislature · SB 267
Firearms; permit to carry pistol, criminal penalties, exempt persons, established; carrying pistol on employer's property revised; nonsubstantive conforming changes to code
Feb 5, 2026 · Not enacted
Sen. Bobby D. Singleton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would restore a permit requirement for carrying a pistol in a vehicle or on one’s person beginning January 1, 2027, with specified home, property, business, transport, and other exemptions. It did not become law.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-02-05). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 13A-11-74.2 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §13A-11-74.2 (a) Beginning January 1, 2027, except as provided in subsection (b), an individual may not carry a pistol in any vehicle or on his or her person unless the individual possesses a valid carry permit issued pursuant to Section 13A-11-75 or recognized pursuant to 13A-11-85. (b) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) The carrying of a pistol by an individual on land under his or her control. (2) The carrying of a pistol by an individual in his or her place of residence. (3) The carrying of a pistol by an individual in his or her fixed place of business. (4) The carrying of an unloaded pistol in a motor vehicle if the pistol is locked in a compartment or container that is in or affixed securely to the vehicle and out of reach of the driver and any passenger in the vehicle. (c) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. Section 2. Sections 13A-11-74, 13A-11-75, 13A-11-85, and 13A-11-90, Code of Alabama 1975, are amended to read as follows: "§13A-11-74 Section 13A-11-74.2 shall not apply to any of the following: (1) Marshals, sheriffs, prison and jail wardens, and their regularly employed deputies, police officers, and other law enforcement officers of any state or political subdivision thereof. (2) Any member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Space Force of the United States or of the National Guard, or to any member of the National Guard organized reserves or state guard organizations when on duty or going to or from duty. (3) The regularly enrolled members of any organization authorized to purchase or receive weapons from the United States or from this state , provided that those members are at or are going to or from their places of assembly or target practices. (4) Officers or employees of the United States authorized to carry a pistol. (5) Any person engaged in manufacturing, repairing, or dealing in pistols, or the agent or representative of a person possessing, using, or carrying a pistol in the usual or ordinary course of pistol manufacturing, repairing, or dealing business. (6) Any common carrier, except taxicabs, licensed as a common carrier. (7) Any person permitted by law to possess a pistol while carrying it unloaded in a secure wrapper, from the place of purchase to his or her home or place of business, or to or from a place of repair or in moving from one place of abode or business to another."
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Clyde ChamblissAlabama Legislature · SB 206
Relating to crimes and offenses; to create the Retail Theft Crime Prevention Act; to provide for the crime of retail theft in various degrees; to provide for the crime of organized retail theft; to provide criminal penalties for a violation
Jun 16, 2023 · Enacted
Sen. Clyde Chambliss · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The Retail Theft Crime Prevention Act defines retail theft and organized retail theft and establishes offense categories and penalties. Retail theft is a component of larceny-theft; the law does not demonstrate a change in reported statewide property crime.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Assigned Act No. 2023-531. (2023-06-16). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
The fact measures reported property offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. Burglary, larceny-theft and motor-vehicle theft are components of the FBI property-crime series. Fraud and identity theft are outside this property-crime series. A measure about one component is not evidence of a change in total or unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§13A-8-222 A person commits the crime of retail theft if, with the intent to obtain or exert unauthorized control over retail merchandise from a retail merchant, retail establishment, or premises of a retail establishment, or with the intent to deprive the owner or retail merchant of his or her retail merchandise of all or some part of the value thereof or without paying for the retail merchandise, he or she knowingly does any of the following: (1) Conceals upon his or her person or in another manner and takes possession of two or more items of retail merchandise of the retail establishment. (2) Alters, transfers, or removes the label, price tag, marking, indicia of value, or any other markings that aid in determining the value affixed to retail merchandise in a retail establishment, and purchases, or attempts to purchase, the merchandise at less than its value. (3) Transfers retail merchandise in a retail establishment from one container to another with the intent to purchase the merchandise at less than its retail value. (4) Causes the cash register or other sales recording device to reflect less than the retail value of the retail merchandise of a retail establishment. (5) Fails to scan the barcode and pay for retail merchandise at a cash register or self-checkout register. (6) Causes the amount paid to be less than the retail merchant's stated price for the retail merchandise. (7) Alters, bypasses, disables, shields, or removes any security or alarm device attached to or housing retail merchandise prior to the purchase of the merchandise. (8) Removes or causes the removal of retail merchandise from the premises of a retail establishment. (9) Collaborates with an employee of the retail establishment to commit any form of retail theft described in this section. §13A-8-223 (a)(1) Retail theft that exceeds two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) in retail value constitutes retail theft in the first degree. (2) Retail theft of one or more items of retail merchandise during a 180-day period, the aggregate value of which is one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more constitutes retail theft in the first degree. (3) Theft of a firearm, rifle, or shotgun, regardless of its value, from a retail merchant constitutes retail theft in the first degree. (b) Retail theft in the first degree is a Class B felony. §13A-8-224 (a) Retail theft that exceeds five hundred dollars ($500) in retail value, but does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) in retail value, constitutes retail theft in the second degree. (b) Retail theft in the second degree is a Class C felony. §13A-8-225 (a) Retail theft that does not exceed five hundred dollars ($500) in retail value constitutes retail theft in the third degree. (b) Retail theft in the third degree is a Class A misdemeanor. (c) A fourth or subsequent conviction for an offense under this article is a Class C felony. §13A-8-226 (a) A person commits the crime of organized retail theft when the person, in association with one or more other persons, knowingly does any of the following: (1) Organizes, supervises, finances, participates, directs, solicits, or otherwise manages or assists another person in committing organized retail theft. (2) Removes, destroys, deactivates, or knowingly evades any component of an antishoplifting or inventory control device to prevent the activation of that device or to facilitate another person in committing organized retail theft. (3) Attempts, solicits, or conspires with another person to commit organized retail theft. (4) Receives, purchases, or possesses retail merchandise for sale or resale knowing or believing the retail merchandise to be stolen is from a retail merchant. (5) Uses any fraud, artifice, instrument, container, device, or other article to facilitate the commission of organized retail theft. (6) Remains unlawfully inside a retail establishment after business hours, with the intent to commit a retail theft therein. (7) Uses a wireless telecommunication device or other digital or electronic device to facilitate the theft of retail merchandise. (8) Uses a rental or stolen motor vehicle or vehicle of another in the course of committing retail theft for the purposes of the concealment of his or her identity. (9) Receives, retains, or disposes of retail merchandise knowing that it has been stolen or having reasonable grounds to believe it has been stolen. (b)(1) Theft of one or more items of retail merchandise, the aggregate value of which exceeds two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) in retail value during a one-year or longer period, constitutes organized retail theft. (2) Theft of retail merchandise consisting of one or more items of retail merchandise during a 180-day period, the aggregate value of which is one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more, constitutes organized retail theft. (3) Theft or retail merchandise consisting of one or more items of retail merchandise during a 30-day period, the aggregate value of which is five hundred dollars ($500) or more, constitutes organized retail theft. (c) It shall be prima facie evidence that a person who violates this section acts knowingly when any of the following apply: (1) On two or more separate occasions within a year prior of the commission of the instant offense of organized retail theft, the person is found in possession or control of stolen retail merchandise. (2) The person possesses retail merchandise which has been recently stolen. (3) The person regularly buys, sells, uses, or handles in the course of business retail merchandise of the sort received, and acquired the retail merchandise without making reasonable inquiry whether the individual selling or delivering the retail merchandise to him or her had a legal right to do so. (d) The fact that the person or persons who acted in association with the person charged under this article have not been charged, convicted, apprehended, or identified is not a defense to a charge of organized retail theft. (e) Organized retail theft is a Class B felony.
Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Alabama snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Alabama, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.