U.S. Senate roll-call positions

Sherrod Brown public records

5,957 captured recordsJanuary 8, 2007–December 21, 2024

Back to profile
About these records

This archive covers every numbered U.S. Senate roll call in the listed service period. Each entry links to its canonical Senate page, and it never infers a position from attendance, silence, sponsorship, or a voice vote.

Procedural votes, amendments, nominations, resolutions, final-passage votes, executive actions, and official statements remain separately labeled. A statement or department announcement is not converted into a legislative vote or proof that the officeholder personally performed the underlying work.

Archive status: Complete roll-call universe; historical rows are being progressively revalidated directly against Senate.gov

Evidence provenance: 0 records currently retain directly captured Senate text; 5957 historical records use identity-matched Voteview bulk fields reconciled to official Senate clerk numbers. The direct collector replaces those rows over time.

Public record at a glance

What this archive contains

These are descriptive counts from captured official records, not an ideology, effectiveness, or intent score. Subject labels are navigation aids assigned from official measure text. A vote does not establish why the candidate voted that way or support for every provision in a measure.

Vote events
5,957
Unique measures
2,111
Final passage
276
All Yes / No events
4,776 / 1,087
Filter by

5,957 records

Page 1 of 239
  1. Final passageVoted yes

    H.R. 10545 — A bill making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 339 · Bill Passed

    What this issue meant

    A bill making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On Passage of the Bill

    Vote description: A bill making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.

    Vote result: Bill Passed

    Member cast: Yea

  2. Final passageVoted yes

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 338 · Bill Passed

    What this issue meant

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official measure description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On Passage of the Bill

    Vote description: A bill to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Vote result: Bill Passed

    Member cast: Yea

  3. Other procedural voteVoted yes

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 337 · Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official measure description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Motion

    Vote description: A bill to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Vote result: Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  4. AmendmentVoted no on amendment

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 · Amendment 3331

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 336 · Amendment Rejected

    What this amendment vote meant

    To delay the repeal of the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions until additional changes are made to offset any negative impacts on the actuarial balance of the Social Security Trust Funds.

    Underlying bill context

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official underlying-bill description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Exact official amendment text

    To delay the repeal of the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions until additional changes are made to offset any negative impacts on the actuarial balance of the Social Security Trust Funds.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Amendment

    Vote description: To delay the repeal of the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions until additional changes are made to offset any negative impacts on the actuarial balance of the Social Security Trust Funds.

    Vote result: Amendment Rejected

    Member cast: Nay

  5. AmendmentVoted no on amendment

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 · Amendment 3360

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 335 · Amendment Rejected

    What this amendment vote meant

    The exact official amendment text has been captured and is available below. A concise evidence-bound description has not yet been generated.

    Underlying bill context

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official underlying-bill description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Exact official amendment text

    [Pages S7344-S7345] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] SA 3360. Mr. CRUZ proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 82, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions; as follows: Strike all…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Amendment

    Vote description: In the nature of a substitute.

    Vote result: Amendment Rejected

    Member cast: Nay

  6. AmendmentVoted no on amendment

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 · Amendment 3352

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 334 · Amendment Rejected

    What this amendment vote meant

    To provide for automatic continuing resolutions.

    Underlying bill context

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official underlying-bill description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Exact official amendment text

    To provide for automatic continuing resolutions.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Amendment

    Vote description: To provide for automatic continuing resolutions.

    Vote result: Amendment Rejected

    Member cast: Nay

  7. AmendmentVoted no on amendment

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 · Amendment 3346

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 333 · Amendment Rejected

    What this amendment vote meant

    To adjust the normal and early retirement ages for Social Security benefits and increase the maximum age for delayed retirement credits.

    Underlying bill context

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official underlying-bill description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Exact official amendment text

    To adjust the normal and early retirement ages for Social Security benefits and increase the maximum age for delayed retirement credits.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Amendment

    Vote description: To adjust the normal and early retirement ages for Social Security benefits and increase the maximum age for delayed retirement credits.

    Vote result: Amendment Rejected

    Member cast: Nay

  8. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2245 — Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 332 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  9. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2245 — Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 331 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Serena Raquel Murillo, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  10. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2244 — Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 330 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  11. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2244 — Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 329 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Benjamin J. Cheeks, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of California

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  12. Other procedural voteVoted yes

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 328 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official measure description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Motion to Proceed

    Vote description: A bill to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Vote result: Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  13. Other procedural voteVoted yes

    S. 4367 — Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 327 · Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    DIVISION A—WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Water Resources Development Act of 2024 TITLE I—GENERAL PROVISIONS Subtitle A—General Matters (Sec. 1101) This section directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to ensure that potential nonfederal interests are aware of the roles, responsibilities, and financial commitments…

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official measure description

    Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    DIVISION A—WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Water Resources Development Act of 2024 TITLE I—GENERAL PROVISIONS Subtitle A—General Matters (Sec. 1101) This section directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to ensure that potential nonfederal interests are aware of the roles, responsibilities, and financial commitments…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Motion

    Vote description: A bill to provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, and for other purposes.

    Vote result: Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  14. Cloture / proceduralVoted yes

    H.R. 82 — Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 326 · Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official measure description

    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023

    This act repeals provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. The act eliminates the government pension offset, which in various instances reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers who also…

    Official position record

    Vote question: On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed

    Vote description: A bill to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Vote result: Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  15. Other procedural voteVoted yes

    H.R. 5009 — A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 325 · Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Motion

    Vote description: A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    Vote result: Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  16. Cloture / proceduralVoted yes

    H.R. 5009 — A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 324 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: A bill to reauthorize wildlife habitat and conservation programs, and for other purposes.

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  17. NominationVoted yes

    PN 1980 — Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 323 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  18. NominationVoted yes

    PN 1980 — Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 322 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Matthew James Marzano, of Illinois, to be a Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the term of five years expiring June 30, 2028

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  19. NominationVoted yes

    PN 1827 — Noel Wise, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 321 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Noel Wise, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Noel Wise, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of California

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  20. NominationVoted yes

    PN 1789 — Lauren McGarity McFerran, of the District of Columbia, to be a Member of the National Labor Relations Board for the term of five years expiring December 16, 2029

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 320 · Cloture Motion Rejected

    What this issue meant

    Lauren McGarity McFerran, of the District of Columbia, to be a Member of the National Labor Relations Board for the term of five years expiring December 16, 2029

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Lauren McGarity McFerran, of the District of Columbia, to be a Member of the National Labor Relations Board for the term of five years expiring December 16, 2029

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Rejected

    Member cast: Yea

  21. NominationVoted yes

    PN 1650 — Cynthia Valenzuela Dixon, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 319 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Cynthia Valenzuela Dixon, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Cynthia Valenzuela Dixon, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  22. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2017 — Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 318 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  23. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2016 — Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 317 · Nomination Confirmed

    What this issue meant

    Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Nomination

    Vote description: Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Vote result: Nomination Confirmed

    Member cast: Yea

  24. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2017 — Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 316 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Keli Marie Neary, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea

  25. NominationVoted yes

    PN 2016 — Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Congress 118 · Session 2 · Senate vote 315 · Cloture Motion Agreed to

    What this issue meant

    Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Read captured roll-call fieldsReconciled historical evidence

    These fields come from Voteview’s bulk Senate dataset, matched through stable member identifiers and the official Senate clerk vote number. Use the linked Senate page as the canonical record.

    Official position record

    Vote question: On the Cloture Motion

    Vote description: Tiffany Rene Johnson, of Georgia, to be United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia

    Vote result: Cloture Motion Agreed to

    Member cast: Yea