U.S. House roll-call positions

Deb Haaland public records

1,031 captured recordsJanuary 3, 2019–March 11, 2021

About these records

This archive contains candidate-attributable entries captured from United States House roll calls. Each entry preserves the exact official evidence and direct source URL. It never infers a position from attendance, silence, office responsibility, an agenda, or an omitted name.

Procedural votes, amendments, nominations, resolutions, final-passage votes, executive actions, and official statements remain separately labeled. A statement or department announcement is not converted into a legislative vote or proof that the officeholder personally performed the underlying work.

Archive status: Complete and directly captured from United States House roll calls

Public record at a glance

What this archive contains

These are descriptive counts from captured official records, not an ideology, effectiveness, or intent score. Subject labels are navigation aids assigned from official measure text. A vote does not establish why the candidate voted that way or support for every provision in a measure.

Vote events: 1,031
Unique measures: 429
Final passage: 271
All Yes / No events: 790 / 224

Explore common subjects

Useful places to start

1,031 records

Page 1 of 42

Final passageVoted yes
H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-77 · Passed
What this issue meant
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee must wait to receive a completed background check prior to transferring a firearm to an unlicensed person.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.
Read full official summaryCongressional Research Service
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
Official position record
Issue: H R 1446
Vote question: On Passage
Official description: Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 11, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-76 · Failed
What this issue meant
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee must wait to receive a completed background check prior to transferring a firearm to an unlicensed person.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.
Read full official summaryCongressional Research Service
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
Official position record
Issue: H R 1446
Vote question: On Motion to Recommit
Official description: Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 11, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
Final passageVoted yes
H R 8 — Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-75 · Passed
What this issue meant
This bill establishes new background check requirements for firearm transfers between private parties (i.e., unlicensed individuals). Specifically, it prohibits a firearm transfer between private parties unless a licensed gun dealer, manufacturer, or importer first takes possession of the firearm to conduct a background check. The prohibition does not apply to certain firearm transfers or exchanges, such as a gift between spouses in good faith.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021
This bill establishes new background check requirements for firearm transfers between private parties (i.e., unlicensed individuals). Specifically, it prohibits a firearm transfer between private parties unless a licensed gun dealer, manufacturer, or importer first takes possession of the firearm to conduct a background check. The prohibition does not apply to certain firearm transfers or exchanges, such as a gift between spouses in good faith.
Official position record
Issue: H R 8
Vote question: On Passage
Official description: Bipartisan Background Checks Act
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 11, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
H R 8 — Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-74 · Failed
What this issue meant
This bill establishes new background check requirements for firearm transfers between private parties (i.e., unlicensed individuals). Specifically, it prohibits a firearm transfer between private parties unless a licensed gun dealer, manufacturer, or importer first takes possession of the firearm to conduct a background check. The prohibition does not apply to certain firearm transfers or exchanges, such as a gift between spouses in good faith.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021
This bill establishes new background check requirements for firearm transfers between private parties (i.e., unlicensed individuals). Specifically, it prohibits a firearm transfer between private parties unless a licensed gun dealer, manufacturer, or importer first takes possession of the firearm to conduct a background check. The prohibition does not apply to certain firearm transfers or exchanges, such as a gift between spouses in good faith.
Official position record
Issue: H R 8
Vote question: On Motion to Recommit
Official description: Bipartisan Background Checks Act
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 11, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021 · Amendment 29
U.S. House roll call 2021-73 · Agreed to
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part D of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 1: Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Underlying bill context
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The bill description supplies underlying context only. The separate chamber record proves that this was an amendment vote and records the candidate’s position.
Official underlying-bill description
Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021
(Sec. 2) This bill revises background check requirements applicable to proposed firearm transfers from a federal firearms licensee (e.g., a licensed gun dealer) to an unlicensed person. Specifically, it increases the amount of time, from 3 business days to a minimum of 10 business days, that a federal firearms licensee…
Exact official amendment text
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part D of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 1: Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1446
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Nadler of New York Part D Amendment En Bloc No. 1
Status: Agreed to
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 10, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Underlying bill overview ↗Official amendment document ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1319 — American Rescue Plan Act · Chamber amendment
U.S. House roll call 2021-72 · Passed
What this amendment vote meant
The House voted on whether to accept the Senate's amended version of H R 1319, described by the Clerk as “American Rescue Plan Act.” The roll call does not identify the Senate's changes as a separately numbered House amendment.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
Vote question: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment Official description: American Rescue Plan Act
Official position record
Issue: H R 1319
Vote question: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Official description: American Rescue Plan Act
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 10, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
ADJOURN
U.S. House roll call 2021-71 · Failed
What this issue meant
On Motion to Adjourn
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: ADJOURN
Vote question: On Motion to Adjourn
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 10, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Final passageVoted yes
H R 842 — Protecting the Right to Organize Act
U.S. House roll call 2021-70 · Passed
What this issue meant
Protecting the Right to Organize Act
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H R 842
Vote question: On Passage
Official description: Protecting the Right to Organize Act
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
H R 842 — Protecting the Right to Organize Act
U.S. House roll call 2021-69 · Failed
What this issue meant
Protecting the Right to Organize Act
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H R 842
Vote question: On Motion to Recommit
Official description: Protecting the Right to Organize Act
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
AmendmentVoted no on amendment
H R 842 · Amendment 26
U.S. House roll call 2021-68 · Failed
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 2: Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 18, and 19.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 2: Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 18, and 19.
Official position record
Issue: H R 842
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Scott of Virginia Part B Amendment En Bloc No. 2
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 842 · Amendment 25
U.S. House roll call 2021-67 · Agreed to
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 1: Nos. 1, 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-10 as en bloc No. 1: Nos. 1, 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17.
Official position record
Issue: H R 842
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Scott of Virginia Part B Amendment En Bloc No. 1
Status: Agreed to
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
ResolutionVoted yes
H RES 198 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
U.S. House roll call 2021-66 · Passed
What this issue meant
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H RES 198
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Resolution
Official description: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Other procedural voteVoted yes
H RES 198 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
U.S. House roll call 2021-65 · Passed
What this issue meant
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H RES 198
Vote question: On Ordering the Previous Question
Official description: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 9, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
ResolutionVoted yes
H RES 188 — Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
U.S. House roll call 2021-64 · Passed
What this issue meant
Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H RES 188
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Resolution
Official description: Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 8, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Other procedural voteVoted yes
H RES 188 — Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
U.S. House roll call 2021-63 · Passed
What this issue meant
Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H RES 188
Vote question: On Ordering the Previous Question
Official description: Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 8, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Final passageVoted yes
H R 1 — For the People Act
U.S. House roll call 2021-62 · Passed
What this issue meant
For the People Act
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Passage
Official description: For the People Act
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
H R 1 — For the People Act
U.S. House roll call 2021-61 · Failed
What this issue meant
For the People Act
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Motion to Recommit
Official description: For the People Act
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
Final passageVoted yes
H R 1280 — George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-60 · Passed
What this issue meant
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training requirements. The bill enhances existing enforcement mechanisms to remedy violations by law enforcement.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.
Read full official summaryCongressional Research Service
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training…
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training…
Official position record
Issue: H R 1280
Vote question: On Passage
Official description: George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
Status: Passed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
H R 1280 — George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
U.S. House roll call 2021-59 · Failed
What this issue meant
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training requirements. The bill enhances existing enforcement mechanisms to remedy violations by law enforcement.
Concise excerpt from the official summary; no wording was added. The full official text is available below.
Read full official summaryCongressional Research Service
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training…
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
The exact official CRS summary supplies measure context; the separate chamber roll-call record proves the candidate’s position. The summary is not used to infer the candidate’s motive.
Official measure description
George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training…
Official position record
Issue: H R 1280
Vote question: On Motion to Recommit
Official description: George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official CRS summary ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1 · Amendment 23
U.S. House roll call 2021-58 · Agreed to
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 as en bloc No. 4: Nos. 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, and 56.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 as en bloc No. 4: Nos. 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, and 56.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Lofgren of California Part B Amendment En Bloc No. 4
Status: Agreed to
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1 · Amendment 22
U.S. House roll call 2021-57 · Failed
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment numbered 37 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to lower the mandatory minimum voting age in Federal elections to 16 years of age.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment numbered 37 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to lower the mandatory minimum voting age in Federal elections to 16 years of age.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Pressley of Massachusetts Part B Amendment No. 37
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
Other procedural voteVoted no
ADJOURN
U.S. House roll call 2021-56 · Failed
What this issue meant
On Motion to Adjourn
This was a procedural action. It is not presented as a vote on final passage.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Official position record
Issue: ADJOURN
Vote question: On Motion to Adjourn
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 3, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1 · Amendment 20
U.S. House roll call 2021-55 · Agreed to
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 as en bloc No. 3: Nos. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 38.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 as en bloc No. 3: Nos. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 38.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Lofgren of California Part B Amendment En Bloc No. 3
Status: Agreed to
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 2, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
AmendmentVoted no on amendment
H R 1 · Amendment 19
U.S. House roll call 2021-54 · Failed
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment numbered 19 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to strike Subtitle C of Title III "Enhancing Protections for United States Democratic Instructions" creating a national strategy to protect US democratic institutions by establishing a national commission.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment numbered 19 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to strike Subtitle C of Title III "Enhancing Protections for United States Democratic Instructions" creating a national strategy to protect US democratic institutions by establishing a national commission.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Rodney Davis of Illinois Part B Amendment No. 19
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Nay
March 2, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗
AmendmentVoted yes on amendment
H R 1 · Amendment 18
U.S. House roll call 2021-53 · Failed
What this amendment vote meant
An amendment numbered 14 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to clarify that felony convictions do not bar any eligible individual from voting in federal elections, including individuals who are currently incarcerated.
Evidence-bound description derived from the retained official amendment record; exact supporting text and the official source are available below.
Read exact official source textDirect official evidence
These fields were retained directly from the official legislative record without changing the member’s reported position.
Exact official amendment text
An amendment numbered 14 printed in Part B of House Report 117-9 to clarify that felony convictions do not bar any eligible individual from voting in federal elections, including individuals who are currently incarcerated.
Official position record
Issue: H R 1
Vote question: On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment author: Bush of Missouri Part B Amendment No. 14
Status: Failed
Haaland | D | NM | Yea
March 2, 2021Official U.S. House roll call ↗Official amendment document ↗

What this archive contains

1,031 records

H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021

H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021

H R 8 — Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021

H R 8 — Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021

H R 1446 — Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021 · Amendment 29

H R 1319 — American Rescue Plan Act · Chamber amendment

ADJOURN

H R 842 — Protecting the Right to Organize Act

H R 842 — Protecting the Right to Organize Act

H R 842 · Amendment 26

H R 842 · Amendment 25

H RES 198 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5

H RES 198 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1319) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 5

H RES 188 — Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes

H RES 188 — Providing for consideration of H.R. 842, Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 8, Bipartisan Background Checks Act; H.R. 1446, Enhanced Background Checks Act; and for other purposes

H R 1 — For the People Act

H R 1 — For the People Act

H R 1280 — George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021

H R 1280 — George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021

H R 1 · Amendment 23

H R 1 · Amendment 22

ADJOURN

H R 1 · Amendment 20

H R 1 · Amendment 19

H R 1 · Amendment 18