North Carolina candidate filing
VerifiedRead exact official contact textExact evidence retained
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Campaign email: [email protected]
Candidate websites
North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice Seat 1
2026 North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice — Seat 1 — General Election · November 3, 2026
Current North Carolina general-election candidacy and all displayed profile fields retain exact source evidence. The State Board says its candidate list is not final, so official withdrawals, replacements, disqualifications, and court-ordered changes remain monitored.
Last reviewed September 15, 2026Policy statements from campaign-controlled sources are labeled candidate positions; they are not independently presented as proven outcomes.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Election date: 11/03/2026
Contest: NC SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE SEAT 01
Candidate: Anita Earls
Party: DEM
Candidacy date: 12/01/2025
Campaign email: [email protected]
Campaign phone: 9196068473
Only contact details published in official filing records, FEC filings, or a verified candidate-owned source with retained exact evidence appear here.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Campaign email: [email protected]
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Election date: 11/03/2026
Contest: NC SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE SEAT 01
Candidate: Anita Earls
Party: DEM
Candidacy date: 12/01/2025
Campaign email: [email protected]
Campaign phone: 9196068473
Discovery lead only: live candidate name and current office verification required
Publication here means only that the contact detail appeared in the cited filing. It is not an endorsement, and older filings may remain visible until an amended official record is captured.
Verified records and candidate-provided claims are labeled separately.
Her values of justice, equality, and fairness for all were born of the struggle she experienced growing up in a mixed-race family at a time when interracial marriages were illegal in most of the country.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Her values of justice, equality, and fairness for all were born of the struggle she experienced growing up in a mixed-race family at a time when interracial marriages were illegal in most of the country.
President Clinton appointed her to be a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Returning to North Carolina, she worked alongside Julius Chambers at the UNC Center for Civil Rights and, in 2007, founded the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that partners with historically marginalized communities across the South. After serving as the organization’s executive director for 10 years, Justice Anita Earls was elected to the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2018.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
President Clinton appointed her to be a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Returning to North Carolina, she worked alongside Julius Chambers at the UNC Center for Civil Rights and, in 2007, founded the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that partners with historically marginalized communities across the South. After serving as the organization’s executive director for 10 years, Justice Anita Earls was elected to the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2018.
“I spent my career as an attorney fighting to protect and defend the freedoms of everyday North Carolinians. Now, as your Justice, I’ve continued to uphold the rights enshrined in our State Constitution — like access to healthcare, a sound basic public education, and the right to vote.”
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
“I spent my career as an attorney fighting to protect and defend the freedoms of everyday North Carolinians. Now, as your Justice, I’ve continued to uphold the rights enshrined in our State Constitution — like access to healthcare, a sound basic public education, and the right to vote.”
A position shows what the candidate said—not FactVote's endorsement.
Each summary is supported by the candidate's own words from a campaign source, direct candidate response, or official primary record retained with the profile.
No position is inferred from a filing, party label, name-only search result, or third-party description.
Complete available exact North Carolina appellate authored-opinion roles with selected highlights
The searchable archive contains 103 exact named judicial roles from official North Carolina appellate authored-opinion indexes (103 authored opinions, 0 concurrences, 0 dissents, 0 joined opinions, and 0 explicit nonparticipations). These roles are not converted into assumed policy beliefs or an outcome scorecard.
Coverage: May 10, 2019 through May 22, 2026These are descriptive counts from captured official records, not an ideology, effectiveness, or intent score. Subject labels are navigation aids assigned from official measure text. A vote does not establish why the candidate voted that way or support for every provision in a measure.
See all 103 recordsAnita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether currituck county could spend its occupancy tax revenues on public safety services..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2026-05-22
Costanzo v. Currituck County (101PA24 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether Currituck County could spend its occupancy tax revenues on public safety services.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the trial court's admission of cell-phone text messages constituted plain error..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2026-05-22
State v. Hicks (136PA22-2 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether the trial court's admission of cell-phone text messages constituted plain error.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether police had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2026-05-22
State v. Dobson (190PA24 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether police had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the trial court abused its discretion by certifying a class of home builders seeking a refund of certain capital facilities fees..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2026-03-20
Wardson Constr., Inc. v. City of Raleigh (115A25 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether the trial court abused its discretion by certifying a class of home builders seeking a refund of certain Capital Facilities Fees.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether map act recordings effectuate indefinite takings of restricted property rights when the map act itself was later repealed, and the proper measure of compensation for this indefinite taking..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2025-12-12
Mata v. N.C. Dep't of Transp. (217PA24 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether Map Act recordings effectuate indefinite takings of restricted property rights when the Map Act itself was later repealed, and the proper measure of compensation for this indefinite taking.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the business court erred in dismissing a claim for judicial dissolution under n.c.g.s. 55-14-30(2)(ii) for lack of standing when the plaintiff-shareholder held the contractual right to exercise a put option and sell their shares back to the company at fair market value..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2025-10-17
Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co. (318A24 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether the Business Court erred in dismissing a claim for judicial dissolution under N.C.G.S. 55-14-30(2)(ii) for lack of standing when the plaintiff-shareholder held the contractual right to exercise a put option and sell their shares back to the company at fair market value.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, where the jury determined that homeowners' chickens were not household pets and therefore were prohibited by a restrictive covenant barring poultry..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2025-08-22
Schroeder v. Oak Grove Farm Homeowners Ass'n (123PA24 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, where the jury determined that homeowners' chickens were not household pets and therefore were prohibited by a restrictive covenant barring poultry.
Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the court of appeals erred in reversing dismissal of a claim for negligence at the 12(b)(6) stage based on contributory negligence and in affirming dismissal of a claim for punitive damages..
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Filed: 2025-05-23
Jones v. J. Kim Hatcher Ins. Agencies, Inc. (264A23 - Published)
Author: Justice Anita Earls
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing dismissal of a claim for negligence at the 12(b)(6) stage based on contributory negligence and in affirming dismissal of a claim for punitive damages.
This is the complete currently available official authored-opinions index for the verified service years through the capture date. It is not every case in which the judge participated. Only opinions explicitly naming the candidate as author are retained; case descriptions and author labels are quoted from the official index. Outcomes, ideology, motive, and policy beliefs are not inferred.
Official filings may be amended after publication.
North Carolina state-level totals remain withheld until the official disclosure system resolves this candidate to one exact committee and compatible reporting period. A candidate-name search alone does not attach a committee, multiple committees are not silently combined, and missing values are not zero.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Search Campaign Funding and Spending Reports and Penalties
Claims that did not clear the publication standard remain visibly excluded.
Reason: NO_EXACT_ATTRIBUTABLE_POSITION_TEXT_CAPTURED
No exact candidate-attributable current policy text passed both the candidate-owned source gate and the independent contextual-integrity review. Third-party descriptions, party platforms, biography, campaign utility copy, and incomplete excerpts are not substituted.
Every profile claim points back to retained source evidence.
North Carolina State Board of Elections
Open North Carolina State Board of ElectionsAnita Earls campaign
Open Anita Earls campaignAnita Earls campaign
Open Anita Earls campaignNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina Judicial Branch
Open North Carolina Judicial BranchNorth Carolina State Board of Elections
Open North Carolina State Board of Elections