IncumbentDemocratic

Anita Earls

North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice Seat 1

2026 North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice — Seat 1 — General Election · November 3, 2026

Published evidence-backed profile

Current North Carolina general-election candidacy and all displayed profile fields retain exact source evidence. The State Board says its candidate list is not final, so official withdrawals, replacements, disqualifications, and court-ordered changes remain monitored.

Last reviewed September 15, 2026

Overview

Current race
2026 North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice — Seat 1 — General Election on November 3, 2026
Official candidacy
North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice Seat 1 · Democratic · Incumbent
Identity match
Identity verified in official records

Policy statements from campaign-controlled sources are labeled candidate positions; they are not independently presented as proven outcomes.

View exact official filing textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Election date: 11/03/2026

Contest: NC SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE SEAT 01

Candidate: Anita Earls

Party: DEM

Candidacy date: 12/01/2025

Campaign email: [email protected]

Campaign phone: 9196068473

Official and campaign contacts

Only contact details published in official filing records, FEC filings, or a verified candidate-owned source with retained exact evidence appear here.

Verified candidate website

Verified

Verified candidate website ↗

Read exact candidate-published contact textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Election date: 11/03/2026

Contest: NC SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE SEAT 01

Candidate: Anita Earls

Party: DEM

Candidacy date: 12/01/2025

Campaign email: [email protected]

Campaign phone: 9196068473

Discovery lead only: live candidate name and current office verification required

Publication here means only that the contact detail appeared in the cited filing. It is not an endorsement, and older filings may remain visible until an amended official record is captured.

Experience

Verified records and candidate-provided claims are labeled separately.

MEET JUSTICE ANITA EARLS

Source-published biography

Her values of justice, equality, and fairness for all were born of the struggle she experienced growing up in a mixed-race family at a time when interracial marriages were illegal in most of the country.

Read exact supporting textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Her values of justice, equality, and fairness for all were born of the struggle she experienced growing up in a mixed-race family at a time when interracial marriages were illegal in most of the country.

MEET JUSTICE ANITA EARLS

Source-published biography

President Clinton appointed her to be a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Returning to North Carolina, she worked alongside Julius Chambers at the UNC Center for Civil Rights and, in 2007, founded the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that partners with historically marginalized communities across the South. After serving as the organization’s executive director for 10 years, Justice Anita Earls was elected to the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2018.

Read exact supporting textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

President Clinton appointed her to be a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Returning to North Carolina, she worked alongside Julius Chambers at the UNC Center for Civil Rights and, in 2007, founded the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that partners with historically marginalized communities across the South. After serving as the organization’s executive director for 10 years, Justice Anita Earls was elected to the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2018.

“I spent my career as an attorney fighting to protect and defend the freedoms of everyday North Carolinians. Now, as your Justice, I’ve continued to uphold the rights enshrined in our State Constitution — like access to healthcare, a sound basic public education, and the right to vote.”

Source-published biography

“I spent my career as an attorney fighting to protect and defend the freedoms of everyday North Carolinians. Now, as your Justice, I’ve continued to uphold the rights enshrined in our State Constitution — like access to healthcare, a sound basic public education, and the right to vote.”

Read exact supporting textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

“I spent my career as an attorney fighting to protect and defend the freedoms of everyday North Carolinians. Now, as your Justice, I’ve continued to uphold the rights enshrined in our State Constitution — like access to healthcare, a sound basic public education, and the right to vote.”

Positions and priorities

A position shows what the candidate said—not FactVote's endorsement.

Each summary is supported by the candidate's own words from a campaign source, direct candidate response, or official primary record retained with the profile.

No attributable policy statements identified

No position is inferred from a filing, party label, name-only search result, or third-party description.

Public record

Complete available exact North Carolina appellate authored-opinion roles with selected highlights

103 captured official records

The searchable archive contains 103 exact named judicial roles from official North Carolina appellate authored-opinion indexes (103 authored opinions, 0 concurrences, 0 dissents, 0 joined opinions, and 0 explicit nonparticipations). These roles are not converted into assumed policy beliefs or an outcome scorecard.

Coverage: May 10, 2019 through May 22, 2026
Vote events
103
Unique measures
0
Final passage
0
Yes / No
0 / 0

These are descriptive counts from captured official records, not an ideology, effectiveness, or intent score. Subject labels are navigation aids assigned from official measure text. A vote does not establish why the candidate voted that way or support for every provision in a measure.

See all 103 records
authored opinionauthored opinion

Costanzo v. Currituck County

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether currituck county could spend its occupancy tax revenues on public safety services..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2026-05-22

Costanzo v. Currituck County (101PA24 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether Currituck County could spend its occupancy tax revenues on public safety services.

May 22, 2026
authored opinionauthored opinion

State v. Hicks

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the trial court's admission of cell-phone text messages constituted plain error..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2026-05-22

State v. Hicks (136PA22-2 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether the trial court's admission of cell-phone text messages constituted plain error.

May 22, 2026
authored opinionauthored opinion

State v. Dobson

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether police had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2026-05-22

State v. Dobson (190PA24 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether police had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle.

May 22, 2026
authored opinionauthored opinion

Wardson Constr., Inc. v. City of Raleigh

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the trial court abused its discretion by certifying a class of home builders seeking a refund of certain capital facilities fees..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2026-03-20

Wardson Constr., Inc. v. City of Raleigh (115A25 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by certifying a class of home builders seeking a refund of certain Capital Facilities Fees.

March 20, 2026
authored opinionauthored opinion

Mata v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether map act recordings effectuate indefinite takings of restricted property rights when the map act itself was later repealed, and the proper measure of compensation for this indefinite taking..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2025-12-12

Mata v. N.C. Dep't of Transp. (217PA24 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether Map Act recordings effectuate indefinite takings of restricted property rights when the Map Act itself was later repealed, and the proper measure of compensation for this indefinite taking.

December 12, 2025
authored opinionauthored opinion

Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co.

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the business court erred in dismissing a claim for judicial dissolution under n.c.g.s. 55-14-30(2)(ii) for lack of standing when the plaintiff-shareholder held the contractual right to exercise a put option and sell their shares back to the company at fair market value..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2025-10-17

Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co. (318A24 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether the Business Court erred in dismissing a claim for judicial dissolution under N.C.G.S. 55-14-30(2)(ii) for lack of standing when the plaintiff-shareholder held the contractual right to exercise a put option and sell their shares back to the company at fair market value.

October 17, 2025
authored opinionauthored opinion

Schroeder v. Oak Grove Farm Homeowners Ass'n

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, where the jury determined that homeowners' chickens were not household pets and therefore were prohibited by a restrictive covenant barring poultry..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2025-08-22

Schroeder v. Oak Grove Farm Homeowners Ass'n (123PA24 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, where the jury determined that homeowners' chickens were not household pets and therefore were prohibited by a restrictive covenant barring poultry.

August 22, 2025
authored opinionauthored opinion

Jones v. J. Kim Hatcher Ins. Agencies, Inc.

What this issue meant

Anita Earls is recorded as authoring the opinion shown in the official record for whether the court of appeals erred in reversing dismissal of a claim for negligence at the 12(b)(6) stage based on contributory negligence and in affirming dismissal of a claim for punitive damages..

Read exact official source textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Filed: 2025-05-23

Jones v. J. Kim Hatcher Ins. Agencies, Inc. (264A23 - Published)

Author: Justice Anita Earls

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing dismissal of a claim for negligence at the 12(b)(6) stage based on contributory negligence and in affirming dismissal of a claim for punitive damages.

May 23, 2025

This is the complete currently available official authored-opinions index for the verified service years through the capture date. It is not every case in which the judge participated. Only opinions explicitly naming the candidate as author are retained; case descriptions and author labels are quoted from the official index. Outcomes, ideology, motive, and policy beliefs are not inferred.

Campaign finance

Official filings may be amended after publication.

Current campaign-finance summary unavailable

North Carolina state-level totals remain withheld until the official disclosure system resolves this candidate to one exact committee and compatible reporting period. A candidate-name search alone does not attach a committee, multiple committees are not silently combined, and missing values are not zero.

Read exact official finance identity textExact evidence retained

The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.

Search Campaign Funding and Spending Reports and Penalties

Open Federal Election Commission record ↗

Research boundary

Claims that did not clear the publication standard remain visibly excluded.

Candidate-stated policy positions

Not published

Reason: NO_EXACT_ATTRIBUTABLE_POSITION_TEXT_CAPTURED

No exact candidate-attributable current policy text passed both the candidate-owned source gate and the independent contextual-integrity review. Third-party descriptions, party platforms, biography, campaign utility copy, and incomplete excerpts are not substituted.

Sources

Every profile claim points back to retained source evidence.

  1. Election record

    2026 North Carolina candidate filing — Anita Earls

    North Carolina State Board of Elections

    Open North Carolina State Board of Elections
  2. Candidate-owned primary source

    Anita Earls — candidate-owned primary source 1

    Anita Earls campaign

    Open Anita Earls campaign
  3. Candidate-owned primary source

    Anita Earls — candidate-owned primary source 2

    Anita Earls campaign

    Open Anita Earls campaign
  4. Public-record identity source

    Anita Earls — official current court roster

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  5. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 101PA24 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  6. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 136PA22-2 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  7. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 190PA24 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  8. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 115A25 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  9. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 217PA24 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  10. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 318A24 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  11. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 123PA24 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  12. Government public record

    Anita Earls — 264A23 — PUBLISHED

    North Carolina Judicial Branch

    Open North Carolina Judicial Branch
  13. Official campaign-finance portal

    North Carolina campaign-finance official search tools

    North Carolina State Board of Elections

    Open North Carolina State Board of Elections
← Back to 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice — Seat 1 — General Election