Florida candidate filing
Verified227 Seagull Lane · Sarasota, FL 34236
Read exact official contact textExact evidence retained
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
227 Seagull Lane
Sarasota, FL 34236
This profile is preserved from the August 18, 2026 primary field. This candidate is not in the reviewed current general-election field. Current election · Primary archive · Official candidate list ↗
Candidate websites
U.S. House District 16
2026 Florida U.S. House District 16 — Democratic Primary · August 18, 2026
Official filing status and all displayed profile fields are shown with retained source evidence. Final ballot placement remains explicitly pending.
Last reviewed September 15, 2026Official Florida records identify Jan Schneider as a qualified Democratic filing for U.S. House District 16. Final ballot placement has not yet been established from a current official ballot artifact.
Policy statements from campaign-controlled sources are labeled candidate positions; they are not independently presented as proven outcomes.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
2026 General Election
United States Representative
District 16
Jan Schneider
Democrat
227 Seagull Lane
Sarasota, FL 34236
Status: Qualified
Date Filed: 04/11/2025
Date Qualified: 06/08/2026
Method: Paid Qualifying Fee
Only contact details published in official filing records, FEC filings, or a verified candidate-owned source with retained exact evidence appear here.
227 Seagull Lane · Sarasota, FL 34236
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
227 Seagull Lane
Sarasota, FL 34236
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
FEC committee ID: C00447474
FEC committee name: FRIENDS OF JAN SCHNEIDER
Published email: [email protected]
Published email: [email protected]
Published website: https://www.votejan.com/
FEC committee ID: C00374751
FEC committee name: SCHNEIDER FOR CONGRESS
Published email: [email protected]
Published email: [email protected]
Published website: https://www.votejan.com/
Publication here means only that the contact detail appeared in the cited filing. It is not an endorsement, and older filings may remain visible until an amended official record is captured.
Verified records and candidate-provided claims are labeled separately.
Jan Schneider holds a JD from Yale Law School and a PhD in political science from Yale University. Prior to that, she graduated summa cum laude from Brown University and earned an MIA in international affairs from Columbia.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Jan Schneider holds a JD from Yale Law School and a PhD in political science from Yale University. Prior to that, she graduated summa cum laude from Brown University and earned an MIA in international affairs from Columbia.
Yale Law School – JD (Law Journal), Yale University – MPhil & PhD (Political Science), University of Geneva – Certificate (International Organizations), Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs – MIA & Certificate (Russian Institute) & Brown University -- BA summa cum laude (in 3 years)
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Yale Law School – JD (Law Journal), Yale University – MPhil & PhD (Political Science), University of Geneva – Certificate (International Organizations), Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs – MIA & Certificate (Russian Institute) & Brown University -- BA summa cum laude (in 3 years)
Sarasota
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Sarasota
Florida
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Florida
A position shows what the candidate said—not FactVote's endorsement.
Each summary is supported by the candidate's own words from a campaign source, direct candidate response, or official primary record retained with the profile.
For Support for Allies and Secure Borders!
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
For Support for Allies and Secure Borders!
Jan will fight to protect biodiversity. Opponent Vern Buchanan (R-FL16) has sponsored some animal protection bills with which Jan agrees, but last year he was rated 3% by the League of Conservation Voters.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Jan will fight to protect biodiversity. Opponent Vern Buchanan (R-FL16) has sponsored some animal protection bills with which Jan agrees, but last year he was rated 3% by the League of Conservation Voters.
NOT ONLY THE WEALTHY DESERVE TO BE HEALTHY: Preserve Medicare without conversion to a voucher system and without cuts in benefits; support the Affordable Care Act as a vital step forward, but move to a more efficient, less costly, voluntary Medicare for All insurance program; and fight for healthcare for veterans and military families, including protecting and improving the Veterans Health Administration. [email protected] ISSUES: Jan remains fervent about other issues as well. Please see our “Issues” section and “Jan’s Opinion Pieces.”
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
NOT ONLY THE WEALTHY DESERVE TO BE HEALTHY: Preserve Medicare without conversion to a voucher system and without cuts in benefits; support the Affordable Care Act as a vital step forward, but move to a more efficient, less costly, voluntary Medicare for All insurance program; and fight for healthcare for veterans and military families, including protecting and improving the Veterans Health Administration. [email protected] ISSUES: Jan remains fervent about other issues as well. Please see our “Issues” section and “Jan’s Opinion Pieces.”
Called a “wonk” and a “wonk with heart,” Jan will serve the people of the Florida 16th Congressional District intelligence, dedication and compassion.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Called a “wonk” and a “wonk with heart,” Jan will serve the people of the Florida 16th Congressional District intelligence, dedication and compassion.
Jan Schneider will fight to end ICE and Border Patrol abuses and illegalities and to reduce ICE funding and staffing; to end appalling treatment of detainees, including in inhumane facilities; to create a path to citizenship for deserving immigrants; and to uphold legal requirements and civil liberties. I would have voted for the Bipartisan Border Bill of 2024. Republicans killed it to preserve the border as a campaign issue. A new immigration bill needs: a fair process for considering asylum claims; strengthened provisions against drug and human trafficking and currency smuggling; and assurances of humane treatment. It should also include: a path to citizenship for “Dreamers” and DACA recipients; preservation of Temporary Protected Status for people from countries afflicted by armed conflict, environmental disasters, epidemics or other extraordinary conditions; and accelerated transition to permanent status for Afghan allies who entered under Operation Allies Welcome.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Jan Schneider will fight to end ICE and Border Patrol abuses and illegalities and to reduce ICE funding and staffing; to end appalling treatment of detainees, including in inhumane facilities; to create a path to citizenship for deserving immigrants; and to uphold legal requirements and civil liberties. I would have voted for the Bipartisan Border Bill of 2024. Republicans killed it to preserve the border as a campaign issue. A new immigration bill needs: a fair process for considering asylum claims; strengthened provisions against drug and human trafficking and currency smuggling; and assurances of humane treatment. It should also include: a path to citizenship for “Dreamers” and DACA recipients; preservation of Temporary Protected Status for people from countries afflicted by armed conflict, environmental disasters, epidemics or other extraordinary conditions; and accelerated transition to permanent status for Afghan allies who entered under Operation Allies Welcome.
Yes. Climate change is a clear financial threat to the U.S. economy. Among other things, coastal flooding from rising sea levels is already causing governments, companies and people huge amounts of property damage. For businesses, floods, fires and droughts interrupt supply chains and damage inventories. For families, hotter summers lead to higher air conditioning bills; escalating storm and other risks lead to declines in property values and vastly increased or unaffordable insurance rates; and droughts and other catastrophes increase food and other prices. The United States should – again – rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement. But that is a beginning rather than a solution. In order to limit climate change, the United State must itself accelerate transition to clean and renewable energy sources, reduce dependence on fossil fuels and implement the “polluter pays” principle. And the federal government should reform its reinsurance programs and expand FEMA.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Yes. Climate change is a clear financial threat to the U.S. economy. Among other things, coastal flooding from rising sea levels is already causing governments, companies and people huge amounts of property damage. For businesses, floods, fires and droughts interrupt supply chains and damage inventories. For families, hotter summers lead to higher air conditioning bills; escalating storm and other risks lead to declines in property values and vastly increased or unaffordable insurance rates; and droughts and other catastrophes increase food and other prices. The United States should – again – rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement. But that is a beginning rather than a solution. In order to limit climate change, the United State must itself accelerate transition to clean and renewable energy sources, reduce dependence on fossil fuels and implement the “polluter pays” principle. And the federal government should reform its reinsurance programs and expand FEMA.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE. Just 300 billionaires poured $3 billion into federal elections in the 2024 cycle, 19% of all reported contributions. In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court exacerbated the previous big money situation, by equating money and speech and corporations and citizens. Recently, the Court made it worse in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC, by striking down limits on political party expenditures. I will fight: to prohibit corporate PACs from contributing to federal candidates; to ban lobbyist fundraising; and to close "dark money" loopholes. HEALTHCARE. The United States healthcare system is sick. We spend 18% of GDP on health, the highest per capita, and still rank worse than other developed countries on health indicators. Healthcare should be a right. Congress should: revive Affordable Care Act tax credits; transition to Medicare for All; restore Medicare, Medicaid and VHA cuts; reduce drug prices; and restore access to reproductive care.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE. Just 300 billionaires poured $3 billion into federal elections in the 2024 cycle, 19% of all reported contributions. In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court exacerbated the previous big money situation, by equating money and speech and corporations and citizens. Recently, the Court made it worse in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC, by striking down limits on political party expenditures. I will fight: to prohibit corporate PACs from contributing to federal candidates; to ban lobbyist fundraising; and to close "dark money" loopholes. HEALTHCARE. The United States healthcare system is sick. We spend 18% of GDP on health, the highest per capita, and still rank worse than other developed countries on health indicators. Healthcare should be a right. Congress should: revive Affordable Care Act tax credits; transition to Medicare for All; restore Medicare, Medicaid and VHA cuts; reduce drug prices; and restore access to reproductive care.
First Amendment “freedom of speech” means the right to express ideas and opinions without government interference. It includes not only spoken and written words, but also symbolic expression such as artwork, flag burning, protesting and even expressive clothing. The highest level of protection is accorded political and civic commentary, however unpopular. What free speech does not include is incitement to violence or danger (e.g., yelling “fire” in a crowded theater when there is no fire), false statements constituting slander or libel, or patently obscene material. Although free speech protects the utterer from government interference, governments may enforce time, place and manner restrictions. These days, free speech also apparently covers anything President Trump wants to say, even if knowingly false, contradictory or intended to incite insurrection. On the other hand, it has been argued to preclude a perceived enemy from sharing a photo of seashells arranged to spell "86 47".
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
First Amendment “freedom of speech” means the right to express ideas and opinions without government interference. It includes not only spoken and written words, but also symbolic expression such as artwork, flag burning, protesting and even expressive clothing. The highest level of protection is accorded political and civic commentary, however unpopular. What free speech does not include is incitement to violence or danger (e.g., yelling “fire” in a crowded theater when there is no fire), false statements constituting slander or libel, or patently obscene material. Although free speech protects the utterer from government interference, governments may enforce time, place and manner restrictions. These days, free speech also apparently covers anything President Trump wants to say, even if knowingly false, contradictory or intended to incite insurrection. On the other hand, it has been argued to preclude a perceived enemy from sharing a photo of seashells arranged to spell "86 47".
Both are supposed to – in different ways: Congress makes the laws that create federal agencies; define their rights, responsibilities and restrictions; and provide funding for their operations. Congressional control continues through the power-of-the-purse over the "discretionary" part of the federal budget (national defense, justice, education, etc., but excluding automatic expenses like Social Security). Congress can also conduct oversight hearings, with attendant subpoena powers over documents and testimony and the possibility of contempt citations. The president, as the head of the executive branch, is supposed to make sure that laws are carried out. The president oversees agencies by appointing their heads and other officials (some subject to Senate confirmation), setting priorities and managing spending, and broadly managing day-to-day operations. This is part of the Constitutional design of checks and balances and separation of powers. At present, these are often undermined.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Both are supposed to – in different ways: Congress makes the laws that create federal agencies; define their rights, responsibilities and restrictions; and provide funding for their operations. Congressional control continues through the power-of-the-purse over the "discretionary" part of the federal budget (national defense, justice, education, etc., but excluding automatic expenses like Social Security). Congress can also conduct oversight hearings, with attendant subpoena powers over documents and testimony and the possibility of contempt citations. The president, as the head of the executive branch, is supposed to make sure that laws are carried out. The president oversees agencies by appointing their heads and other officials (some subject to Senate confirmation), setting priorities and managing spending, and broadly managing day-to-day operations. This is part of the Constitutional design of checks and balances and separation of powers. At present, these are often undermined.
With regard to pre-school education, the federal government should continue to fund Head Start Preschool programs and to fund Child Care and Development Block Grants to help low income families with childcare, including preschool. Regarding K-12, the Every Student Succeeds Act, replacing No Child Left Behind, is the main federal law. The federal government should continue to require states to measure performance and to help students from low-income families pursuant to the ESSA. The government should also continue to provide for special education students under the Disabilities Education Act and prevent discrimination under the Civil Rights Act. As to higher education, the federal government is the primary source of student assistance for college and beyond. The Department of Education administers billions of dollars in grants, work-study programs, and student loans under the Higher Education Act. Other agencies fund academic research. These activities should be expanded
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
With regard to pre-school education, the federal government should continue to fund Head Start Preschool programs and to fund Child Care and Development Block Grants to help low income families with childcare, including preschool. Regarding K-12, the Every Student Succeeds Act, replacing No Child Left Behind, is the main federal law. The federal government should continue to require states to measure performance and to help students from low-income families pursuant to the ESSA. The government should also continue to provide for special education students under the Disabilities Education Act and prevent discrimination under the Civil Rights Act. As to higher education, the federal government is the primary source of student assistance for college and beyond. The Department of Education administers billions of dollars in grants, work-study programs, and student loans under the Higher Education Act. Other agencies fund academic research. These activities should be expanded
Public-record research limitation
This is not a finding that the candidate has never held public office or taken an official action. No identity-safe member-level archive is currently attached; FactVote excludes fuzzy and same-name matches and does not infer a negative from missing or silent sources.
Official filings may be amended after publication.
FEC candidate totals January 1, 2025 through September 30, 2026.
The text below is the exact source material used for this statement.
Candidate ID: H2FL13139
Name: SCHNEIDER, JAN
Office: House
State: FL
District: FL16
Coverage start: 2025-01-01
Coverage end: 2026-09-30
Total receipts: $55286.52
Total disbursements: $21767.74
Cash on hand: $74437.52
Debts owed by committee: $15000.00
Candidate contributions: $21586.52
Loans made by candidate: $15000.00
Every profile claim points back to retained source evidence.
Florida Division of Elections
Open Florida Division of ElectionsFederal Election Commission
Open Federal Election CommissionFederal Election Commission
Open Federal Election CommissionFederal Election Commission
Open Federal Election CommissionJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignJan Schneider campaign
Open Jan Schneider campaignVOTE411
Open VOTE411